- Strong quake hits Japan, triggering tsunami
- Sniper heaven: Pentagon’s self-guided bullets leave enemies nowhere to hide
- Violent gang taking advantage of immigration crisis, using border as recruiting hub
- Medicaid enrollment continues to soar under Obamacare, administration says
- Michelle Obama to Latinos: ‘We cannot afford to wait on Congress’ for immigration
- White House urges GOP to act ‘urgently’ on $3.7 billion request for illegal immigrants
- Politicians, criminals using ‘right-to-be-forgotten’ law EU courts forced upon Google
- Combat fatigue: elite special forces troops are ‘fraying,’ Gen. Joseph Votel warns
- German foreign minister to meet Kerry to discuss spying claims
- Florida police spokesman tells citizens: ‘Get yourself some firearms’
BOOK REVIEW: ‘Grant’s Final Victory’
Question of the Day
The “Personal Memoirs of Ulysses S. Grant,” covering Grant’s years as commanding general of the Union Army during the Civil War and his two-term presidency, has been justifiably acclaimed as one of the best books of its genre, on a par with Julius Caesar’s “Commentaries.” The back story of the memoirs - a cancer-stricken man writing to stave off financial ruin for his wife - makes his work even more compelling. It is this story that drives Charles Bracelen Flood’s “Grant’s Final Victory.”
When Grant finished his second term as president in 1877, he was arguably the most popular person in America, respected even by his wartime adversaries. But his financial future was dim, for he had surrendered his claim to a military pension when entering the White House. In an act of grace, admirers led by financier J.P. Morgan gave Grant and his wife $100,000 to enable them to settle in New York, and created a trust that would pay $15,000 a year for life. Grant’s son married into a wealthy family as well.
Unfortunately, the military genius Grant had displayed on the battlefield did not extend to financial affairs. Hence, he was an easy mark for promoter Ferdinand War, “The Young Napoleon of Wall Street,” and his partner, James D. Fish. They persuaded Grant to invest all his own money, and much more from his daughter-in-law’s family, in a firm named Grant & Ward. Displaying fake balance sheets, Ward and Fish convinced the gullible general that his original investment of about $100,000 had quickly grown to “nigh on to a million.”
In fact, Ward and Fish were running a Ponzi scheme. (Perhaps we should update the term to a “Bernie Madoff scheme”?) The fund went bust, with investors out $16 million. Grant, who had no role in operations of the fund, was left broke.
What could be done to keep his wife from ending her days in poverty? Immediately after his presidency, Grant had rejected offers to write a memoir. But the loss of his fortune brought second thoughts. Century Magazine, among the nation’s most popular journals, persuaded him to submit four articles as part of a series of memoirs by Civil War generals, for $500 each.
The magazine’s gifted 31-year-old associate editor, Robert Underwood Johnson, was disappointed with Grant’s first submission on the battle of Shiloh, which he found “substantially a copy of his dry official report of that engagement.” But in their conversations, Johnson realized that Grant was a natural storyteller. Johnson offered suggestions worth heeding by any writer.
“I told him that what was desirable for the success of the [article] was to approximate such a talk as he would make to friends after dinner, some of whom would know all about the battle and some nothing at all, and that the public … was particularly interested in his point of view, in everything that concerned him, in what he planned, thought, saw and did ….” Century then persuaded the general to convert the articles into a full book.
Fortunately for Grant, his friend Mark Twain read the book contract before he signed it. As Twain commented, “I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry.” Century offered a royalty of 10 cents per book sold; further, it wanted to deduct from Grant’s payments “his book’s share of clerk hire, house rent, sweeping out the office, or some such nonsense as that.” Because the books were to be sold by prepaid subscriptions rather than through stores, the prospects for profit were awesome. Demonstrating his faith in the project, Twain offered Grant $100,000 on the spot, saying he would publish it himself.
After negotiations with Century overseen by Twain, Grant received 20 percent of gross sales, plus a $10,000 advance (not a customary practice at the time) for living expenses while he wrote the book. An exultant Twain envisioned that the royalties “will make the largest check ever paid an author in the world’s history.”
But Grant immediately faced another problem. A nagging cough and soreness in his throat made even drinking water excruciatingly painful. He was diagnosed with throat and mouth cancer - perhaps the result of the 24 daily cigars that had long been his regimen. Grant did have research assistants, but he wrote every word in the book. He commenced work in early September 1884; on July 20, 1885, as Twain related, “he put aside his pencil and said there was nothing more to do.” Cancer killed him three days later.
The two-volume book contained 291,000 words in 1,215 pages, including a 77-page appendix containing Grant’s final wartime report. By Mr. Flood’s calculation, the old warrior wrote 750 words “every painful day.” About 300,000 copies of the two-volume set were sold the year of publication, and Grant’s widow received $450,000 in royalties (about $10 million in 2011 dollars).
Charles Bracelen Flood burnishes his reputation as a top-notch historian with the poignant story of the last year of a gallant American hero. Grant’s performance under adversity makes for an inspiring story.
Joseph C. Goulden’s expanded edition of “Spy-Speak: The Dictionary of Intelligence” will be published by Dover Books in January.
TWT Video Picks
By Robert N. Tracci
Congress must use its appropriations power to secure the border
Get Breaking Alerts
- Pentagon's self-guided bullets leave enemies nowhere to hide
- Violent gang MS-13 taking advantage of immigration crisis, using border as recruiting hub
- A 'new Cold War': China's top paper warns of 'slippery slope' towards conflict with U.S.
- Armed militia sets up Texas command center to 'fight for national sovereignty'
- DOJ investigates Norfolk parade float critical of Obama
- PRUDEN: 'Dirty Harry' Reids increasing eccentricity
- Michelle Obama to Latinos: 'We cannot afford to wait on Congress' for immigration
- NASCAR TV contract back to NBC in 2015, leaving ESPN, Turner Sports
- Google Glass-equipped rifles can fire around corners: It's 'mind-blowing when you actually do it'
- Hamas orders civilians to die in Israeli airstrikes
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: How many boondoggles to break the bank?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: The problem is unenforced borders
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Where are condolences for Jewish teens' deaths?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama welcomes illegals, ignores Americans
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama has no intention of repatriating illegals