- NYT’s David Brooks: Obama has ‘manhood problem’ in Middle East
- Ted Cruz thanks Obama for denying visas to terrorists
- Survivors recall chaos, fear in Everest avalanche
- General Mills apologizes for ‘right to sue’ confusion, reverses policy
- Dealer wanted in U.S. for art fraud nabbed in Spain
- Easter morning delivery for space station
- Boxer Rubin ‘Hurricane’ Carter dies at 76
- Probe could complicate Rick Perry’s prospects
- Ukraine, Russia trade blame for eastern shootout
- Obamas head to church on Easter morning
D.C. task force to evaluate traffic-camera fines
A new D.C. Council task force will evaluate hefty fines levied on motorists caught by speed cameras and other forms of automated traffic enforcement, a controversial and expanding system that has some wondering if city leaders care more about revenue than public safety.
Mayor Vincent C. Gray inserted a revenue provision in his fiscal 2013 budget that expands the use of automated enforcement, installing cameras in tunnels and at intersections to catch drivers who try to beat red lights. The measure was among a series of initiatives designed to ensure a balanced budget.
Although Mr. Gray cited public safety as the catalyst for his decision, many residents are wondering if fines of up to $150 are commensurate with the infractions.
Council members Mary M. Cheh, Ward 3 Democrat, and Tommy Wells, Ward 6 Democrat, will lead the task force when it meets for the first time on Tuesday at the John A. Wilson Building. The panel includes a diverse selection of experts on bicycle and pedestrian safety and representatives of AAA Mid-Atlantic and AARP D.C.
Ms. Cheh said the impetus to create a task force “came from a number of things.” Mainly, she and other lawmakers heard complaints from constituents about the severity of the fines and about speed-camera locations.
“They link that with the motives of the government,” she said. “That it’s not really about speeding … it’s really about revenue-raising.”
Ms. Cheh said she favors a tougher approach to motorists who run red lights — deeming that “inherently dangerous” — than to those who go a few too many miles per hour over the speed limit.
The task force is expected to examine the effect automated enforcement has on driving habits and public safety. Members will put together recommendations this fall, which the co-chairmen will use to write legislation to put before the council.
Ms. Cheh acknowledged the November elections could lead to some “political calculations” during debate, since incumbents running for re-election may not want to appear soft on public safety.
“It’s silly season,” she said.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Sebelius not running for Senate, HHS confirms: Report
- Red fox makes a home for himself at the White House: Report
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
- Sen. Joe Manchin keeps his options open for 2016
- Many Americans would quickly face financial hardship after losing job, poll shows
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- USAID documents cite Hillary Clinton in chaos of Afghan aid
- EXCLUSIVE: FBI blocked in corruption probe involving Sens. Reid, Lee
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Study: Children fare better in traditional mom-dad families
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.