- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
D.C. task force to evaluate traffic-camera fines
A new D.C. Council task force will evaluate hefty fines levied on motorists caught by speed cameras and other forms of automated traffic enforcement, a controversial and expanding system that has some wondering if city leaders care more about revenue than public safety.
Mayor Vincent C. Gray inserted a revenue provision in his fiscal 2013 budget that expands the use of automated enforcement, installing cameras in tunnels and at intersections to catch drivers who try to beat red lights. The measure was among a series of initiatives designed to ensure a balanced budget.
Although Mr. Gray cited public safety as the catalyst for his decision, many residents are wondering if fines of up to $150 are commensurate with the infractions.
Council members Mary M. Cheh, Ward 3 Democrat, and Tommy Wells, Ward 6 Democrat, will lead the task force when it meets for the first time on Tuesday at the John A. Wilson Building. The panel includes a diverse selection of experts on bicycle and pedestrian safety and representatives of AAA Mid-Atlantic and AARP D.C.
Ms. Cheh said the impetus to create a task force “came from a number of things.” Mainly, she and other lawmakers heard complaints from constituents about the severity of the fines and about speed-camera locations.
“They link that with the motives of the government,” she said. “That it’s not really about speeding … it’s really about revenue-raising.”
Ms. Cheh said she favors a tougher approach to motorists who run red lights — deeming that “inherently dangerous” — than to those who go a few too many miles per hour over the speed limit.
The task force is expected to examine the effect automated enforcement has on driving habits and public safety. Members will put together recommendations this fall, which the co-chairmen will use to write legislation to put before the council.
Ms. Cheh acknowledged the November elections could lead to some “political calculations” during debate, since incumbents running for re-election may not want to appear soft on public safety.
“It’s silly season,” she said.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Russia should be booted from FIFA World Cup, senators say
- New tool helps figure Obamacare penalties
- Tax-prep firms pitch in, cash in on Obamacare
- Obama tries to reassure Hispanics on Obamacare
- Half of uninsured look to Obamacare exchanges for coverage
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- BRUCE: Obama's bizarre immigration rules
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- IRS to turn over Lerner emails in tea party targeting probe
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Unemployment insurance vote could happen next week
- PRUDEN: Likening Putin to Hitler on Ukraine shows Hillary's shaky grasp of history
- DELAY: A revolution for the Constitution
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again