- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Crop insurance saves taxpayers money
Question of the Day
Romina Boccia suggests in her characterization of crop insurance that American taxpayers should be outraged (“The Farm Bill’s secret handout to big corporate farms,” Politics, Thursday). Quite the contrary. Because of crop insurance, American taxpayers should be relieved: Prior to the investments made in the modern crop-insurance program, taxpayers would have been on the hook for most, if not all, the crop losses resulting from the 2012 drought.
Prior to development of the modern program, response and reaction to agriculture disasters came in the form of 42 supplemental ad-hoc disaster bills, measures that have cost taxpayers $70 billion since 1989 and took up to 18 months to reach growers.
Contrast that to today’s modern crop-insurance program, in which last year 84 percent of eligible acres were protected by private crop-insurance policies purchased by farmers. When a string of natural disasters struck last year, there was not a single call from farmers for disaster aid.
Again this year, most farmers will be able to rebound from historic drought, thanks to crop insurance. Unlike in the past, taxpayers will not stand alone to shoulder the costs. Farmers will pay more than $4 billion in premiums, and insurance companies will incur billions in underwriting losses.
Crop-insurance premium subsidies are not direct cash transfers to farmers. Farmers pay a reduced amount for their premiums and receive an indemnity payment only in the event of an insurable loss. They do not receive “subsidy” payments from crop insurance.
Under this system, the federal government serves as a reinsurer, an insurance company for insurance companies. As such, it shares in the gains and the losses of the policy. Those gains have returned about $3.5 billion to federal coffers in the last decade, which can and will be used to offset losses in years like this one.
Crop insurance has been applauded by farmers, bankers and elected officials for one reason: It works.
THOMAS P. ZACHARIAS
President, National Crop Insurance Services
Overland Park, Kan.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
Get Breaking Alerts
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is 'torture'
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis