- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Crop insurance saves taxpayers money
Question of the Day
Romina Boccia suggests in her characterization of crop insurance that American taxpayers should be outraged (“The Farm Bill’s secret handout to big corporate farms,” Politics, Thursday). Quite the contrary. Because of crop insurance, American taxpayers should be relieved: Prior to the investments made in the modern crop-insurance program, taxpayers would have been on the hook for most, if not all, the crop losses resulting from the 2012 drought.
Prior to development of the modern program, response and reaction to agriculture disasters came in the form of 42 supplemental ad-hoc disaster bills, measures that have cost taxpayers $70 billion since 1989 and took up to 18 months to reach growers.
Contrast that to today’s modern crop-insurance program, in which last year 84 percent of eligible acres were protected by private crop-insurance policies purchased by farmers. When a string of natural disasters struck last year, there was not a single call from farmers for disaster aid.
Again this year, most farmers will be able to rebound from historic drought, thanks to crop insurance. Unlike in the past, taxpayers will not stand alone to shoulder the costs. Farmers will pay more than $4 billion in premiums, and insurance companies will incur billions in underwriting losses.
Crop-insurance premium subsidies are not direct cash transfers to farmers. Farmers pay a reduced amount for their premiums and receive an indemnity payment only in the event of an insurable loss. They do not receive “subsidy” payments from crop insurance.
Under this system, the federal government serves as a reinsurer, an insurance company for insurance companies. As such, it shares in the gains and the losses of the policy. Those gains have returned about $3.5 billion to federal coffers in the last decade, which can and will be used to offset losses in years like this one.
Crop insurance has been applauded by farmers, bankers and elected officials for one reason: It works.
THOMAS P. ZACHARIAS
President, National Crop Insurance Services
Overland Park, Kan.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By Richard Rahn
Treaty would let tyrants peer into Americans' financial information
Get Breaking Alerts
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Babson College, BYU win top spots in Money magazine's college rankings
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- Romney would win popular vote in rematch against Obama: CNN poll
- White House defends Kerry failure to broker Middle East cease-fire
- D.C. plans to seek stay of order striking down ban on handguns in public
- Islamic State opens 'marriage bureau' for single jihadists