- Elton John blasts Russia’s anti-gay laws during Moscow concert
- U.N.: Afghanistan slow to enforce law protecting women
- Heart cancels SeaWorld concert after ‘Blackfish’ documentary
- South Carolina sheriff refuses to lower American flag for Nelson Mandela
- South Africans hold day of prayer for Nelson Mandela
- Mandela not on life support in final hours, friend says
- Ukraine protesters topple, decapitate Lenin statue in Kiev
- Kim Jong-un’s uncle removed from North Korean state documentary
- Thailand crisis deepens as opposition quits Parliament
- Campbell Soup apologizes for SpaghettiOs’ Pearl Harbor tweet
Taliban popular where U.S. fought biggest battle
In Marjah, crime and corruption rule
MARJAH, Afghanistan — Nearly three years after U.S.-led forces launched the biggest operation of the war to clear insurgents, foster economic growth and set a model for the rest of Afghanistan, angry residents of Helmand province say they are too afraid to go out after dark because of marauding bands of thieves.
During the day, they say, corrupt police and government officials bully them into paying bribes.
After 11 years of war, many here long for a return of the Taliban. They say that under the Taliban, who routinely punished thieves by cutting off a hand, they at least were safe from crime and corruption.
“If you had a box of cash on your head, you could go to the farthest part of Marjah, and no one would take it from you, even at night,” said Maulvi Daoud, who runs a cubbyhole-sized shop in the town of Marjah. “Today you bring your motorcycle in front of your shop, and it will be gone.
“Now the situation is that you go on the road and they are standing in police and army uniform[s] with weapons and they can take your money,” he said.
It was in Marjah in early 2010 that about 15,000 NATO and Afghan forces waged the war’s biggest battle.
They not only fought the Taliban with weapons but also promised to bring good governance to Marjah and the rest of the southern province of Helmand and demonstrate to the residents the advantages of shunning the militants.
But it appears the flaw in the plan was the quality of Afghans chosen by President Hamid Karzai to govern and police the area after most of the fighting ended.
That adds to growing doubts about the entire country’s future after foreign troops withdraw by the end of 2014.
Despite military claims of gains across the province and an overall drop in violence, Marjah residents told The Associated Press that NATO’s counterinsurgency experiment has failed.
A bleak picture also emerges from anecdotal evidence collected from dozens of interviews with residents elsewhere in the province, some from the most violent districts.
Many claim the U.S.-funded local police, a type of locally sanctioned militia, routinely demand bribes and threaten to accuse those who do not comply of being members of the Taliban. Good governance never came to Marjah, they say.
In villages of sun-baked mud homes, at crowded bus stops and in local teahouses where residents sit cross-legged on plastic-covered tables drinking tea and eating off communal plates, people scoffed at claims of security and development.
They heaped criticism on the Afghan government and officials, accusing them of stealing billions of dollars in aid money meant for the people, and chided an international community that they said ignored their needs and pandered to a corrupt administration.
“They were never cruel to us, and the one difference was security. It was better during the Taliban,” he said.
His partner in the shop, Mohammed Haider, said poppy farmers who planted substitute crops such as cotton are losing money because they cannot sell their harvests. He predicted poppy production would double when foreign soldiers leave in 2014.
‘We are completely destroyed’
At a bus stop in Helmand’s provincial capital of Lashkar Gah, residents scrambled for dilapidated old buses and cars to go to parts of Helmand.
Hamidullah, who like many Afghans uses only one name, was waiting for a bus to Sangin district – the scene of some of the most violent fighting between the Taliban and British and U.S. forces.
Like the majority of those at the stop, he wanted foreign forces to leave Afghanistan.
“All these foreign soldiers are here, and it is totally insecure everywhere in Helmand,” Hamidullah said. “For the time that they are in Afghanistan, we will always have war.”
Several of the men scrambling on top of the packed buses and jamming themselves into the back of cars seemed to growl at the presence of foreigners in their midst.
A single question: “What is the situation like in Helmand today?” brought a cacophony of answers. Many of the voices sounded angry, some sounded weary, and a few angry-looking men walked away.
“We are completely destroyed today,” Hamidullah said.
“The situation is getting worse and worse,” shouted a voice in the crowd.
Another yelled: “There is no security because of the foreigners.” And from a deeply wrinkled elderly man whose voice seemed both angry and sad: “If the foreigners are out of Afghanistan, all the problems will be solved. Are our lives any better?”
Trouble in Helmand
Analysts who know Helmand say a corrupt government poses one of the biggest hurdles to stability, alienating the local population and driving them into the hands of the Taliban.
The province is strategically important because of massive poppy production, which is financing the insurgency and fueling criminal activity.
While some success has been achieved at getting farmers to plant substitute crops, Helmand is still one of Afghanistan’s largest opium-producing provinces, often blamed on anti-government sentiment and collusion between corrupt government officials and the Taliban.
“While insurgent activity remains problematic in several districts, primarily in northern Helmand and western Kandahar, data from the battle space shows a marked decrease in overall enemy activity,” ISAF spokesman Jamie Graybeal said recently.
Despite a drop of 8 percent in militant attacks from January to October compared to the same period last year, Helmand and neighboring Nimroz province accounted for 32 percent of all such attacks reported across the country from October 2011 to October this year, according to ISAF.
Ryan Evans, a research fellow at the U.S.-based Center for National Policy, called Helmand the “most dangerous and violent” of Afghanistan’s 34 provinces.
“From 2010 to early 2012, one of five ISAF soldiers was killed in this one province – Helmand. And the province has since taken more lives and limbs than any other province,” said Mr. Evans, who worked with U.S. and British troops in Helmand during 2010 and 2011.
By Brahma Chellaney
Beijing's creeping aggression signals a challenge to U.S. presence in the Asian Pacific
- CHELLANEY: China's game of chicken
- Obamas call to close Vatican embassy is 'slap in the face' to Roman Catholics
- 'Dude, I'm dreading that I will have to go': Czech prime minister on Mandela funeral
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- Sen. Rand Paul pushes 'economic freedom zones' for Detroit
- South Carolina sheriff refuses to lower American flag for Nelson Mandela
- U.S. debt jumps a record $328 billion tops $17 trillion for first time
- Early snowfall changes to sleet in D.C. area
- Sen. Rand Paul: 'I am seriously thinking about' running for president in 2016
- Obama: Hole U.S. 'digging out of' requires billions more in unemployment benefits
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Al Maurer provides a common sense, conservatarian, Constitutional conservative perspective from the battleground state of Colorado
Film Reviews and Articles by Kevin Williams
"Critical thinking is thinking about your thinking while you're thinking in order to make your thinking better." - Dr. Richard Paul
Go beyond tourism's "top 10" bus tour destinations with Susan McKee as she explores the varied history, culture, food, and gardens, of the world.
Let it snow
White House pets gone wild!