- The Washington Times - Monday, January 23, 2012

Reading about Meryl Streep’s preparation to act in “The Iron Lady” could lead one to believe that the real Margaret Thatcher was difficult to understand.

But if you go back to the dark days Britain faced in the late 1970s when she became prime minister, it’s really not that hard.

To pay its bills, Britain had to borrow money from the International Monetary Fund. Protracted labor disputes led to long strikes and the “Winter of Discontent” in 1978.

That year, dead bodies went unburied. Uncollected trash piled up in the streets. More strikes loomed. It was no surprise when Labor Prime Minister James Callaghan was defeated in the 1979 general election and replaced by a Conservative, Mrs. Thatcher.


Like Ronald Reagan, though, Mrs. Thatcher saw a nation in decline not as an inevitability to be managed but as a problem to be solved. She believed the answer to Britain’s problems was not more socialism, which she didn’t hesitate to lambast by name, but free enterprise.

“I wanted to achieve my ambition of a capital-owning democracy,” she said. “This is a state in which people own houses, shares, and have a stake in society, and in which they have wealth to pass on to future generations.”

Getting there required tremendous fortitude on Lady Thatcher’s part. Unlike previous governments, both Labor and Conservative, she didn’t intend just to go along to get along. She believed government was doing too much. She launched a plan to get rid of what she called Britain’s “nanny state.”

That mainly meant breaking the power of trade unions and monopoly nationalized industries. Mrs. Thatcher also intended to take control of the money supply, shrink the budget deficit, trim state spending, cut taxes and reduce government regulations. It was quite an agenda.

Eventually, she prevailed. The government rode out a violent coal miners strike in 1984. In the past, miners had faced down and intimidated governments. Not Mrs. Thatcher‘s. She refused to back down and launched a new era in labor relations.

She had an understanding, rare among politicians, of where the money that funded “government spending” comes from - not from some magic coffer, but from the pockets of hardworking citizens. Politicians, she reminded us all, must borrow or tax the money they use (or, all too often, misuse).

Mrs. Thatcher also saw eye to eye with Reagan on the common-sense doctrine of peace through strength, not accommodation and appeasement. “Wars are not caused by the buildup of weapons,” she told the U.S. Congress. “They are caused when an aggressor believes he can achieve his objectives at an acceptable price.”

In addition, she had a keen appreciation for America’s unique role in the world. As she remarked in 2002 as she accepted the Heritage Foundation’s Clare Boothe Luce Award: “It is always good to come to America. Whereas other countries remind you of problems, America teaches you possibilities.

“America today is the only global superpower. Like it or not - and, on balance, I do like it - that is a fact. Only America has the reach and means to deal with Osama bin Laden or Saddam Hussein or the other wicked psychopaths who will sooner or later step into their shoes. The rest of the world can and should do more. But so often, wealthy countries with much to offer and more to lose just cheer - or grumble - on the sidelines.

“For those who love liberty, the fortunes of America are even more our preoccupation than in years gone by.”

It was because she loved liberty - and worked tirelessly to defend it - that we at Heritage are proud to have Lady Thatcher as our patron and to be the home of the Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom. We know the real “Iron Lady.” No Hollywood production can substitute for the genuine article.

Story Continues →