- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
- U.N. rights chief: Flight MH17 downing possible war crime
- Attack on park in Gaza war kills 10, mostly children
- Calif. protesters to block Israel-owned ships at Port of Oakland
- Obama to give Africa $38M, but tells young leaders: Stop ‘making excuses’ for economy
USPS memo highlights privacy violations
Concern raised on address correction
Question of the Day
The U.S. Postal Service has quietly sought to “immunize” itself from Privacy Act challenges to its address-correction service, a program that gives credit, marketing and data-service providers access to updated name and address information for tens of millions of Americans.
Postal officials say the program helps reduce costly undeliverable mail that can clog up the mail stream, but its failure to obtain consent to sell customers’ information is raising alarm bells from within and outside the agency.
A Postal Service legal memo obtained by The Washington Times proposes pursuing legislation to “immunize the current address correction services from any challenge under the Privacy Act or Section 412.”
The Privacy Act prohibits federal agencies from renting or selling personal information unless specifically authorized by law. Section 412 refers to a provision in federal law that bars the Postal Service from making public names or addresses of postal customers.
“Suggestions have been made that these longstanding services may be inconsistent with current law,” a copy of draft legislation by Postal Service states.
In the legal memo obtained by The Times through the Freedom of Information Act, postal officials wrote that the address-correction services have been “provided for years and are not based on obtaining written consent from customers.”
The legislation hasn’t surfaced in Congress, and postal officials say they stand by the current address correction program. In a statement to The Times, the Postal Service defended the program as consistent with the Privacy Act and Section 412.
“There have been isolated concerns by a very few individuals who do not agree with the Postal Service’s position,” Postal Service officials said. “The legislative language proposed was offered to make stronger what the Postal Service already believes is a strong legal position.”
But Paul Stephens, director of policy and advocacy at the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, said the Postal Service’s public statements don’t square with the legal memo.
“Obviously you don’t go running to the Hill asking for legislation unless you anticipate problems,” he said. “I think they see trouble.”
The undated legal memo refers to “suggestions” that the address-correction service is inconsistent with the law, but postal officials declined to identify the source of those suggestions. Instead, postal officials said they have heard “isolated concerns from a few individuals in the public.”
“However, it is worth emphasizing that we have received overwhelming popular support for both the MoverSource program and the address correction service,” the Postal Service said in its statement.
MoverSource is a joint initiative between Postal Service and Pitney Bowes subsidiary Imagitas Inc., which is in charge of producing welcome kits sent to people who fill out change-of-address forms. The kits, which come in official Postal Service envelopes, are filled with advertising and move-related coupons. The Postal Service and Imagitas split the ad revenue.
The address-correction service is different. It provides major mailers with access to updated information about customers who have filled out change-of-address forms.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Jim McElhatton is an investigative reporter for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- House federal records plan would prevent repeat of IRS email scandal
- Whistleblowers flood VA with lawsuits despite apology
- Outrage over $190M deal for troubled federal contractor USIS
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- White House warned about 'antiquated' VA scheduling system 5 years ago
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- D.C. police chief orders officers not to arrest legal gun owners carrying weapons in public
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- Babson College, BYU win top spots in Money magazine's college rankings
- D.C. seeks stay in order striking down ban on handguns in public
- Family of Marine killed in Afghanistan pushes back against cover-up
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq