Gay history law on Calif. books, but not in texts

Story Topics

• Social Issues
• Education
• Christopher Hoffman
• Department Of Education
• Rick Jacobs

Follow Us On

Facebook

Follow @washtimes

Question of the Day

Are you concerned about the security of the nation's chemical plants?

• Yes
• No
• Undecided
• Other

Login to Vote

View results

California’s first-of-its-kind “gay history” law went into effect Jan. 1, but so far, state educators don’t appear to be on the same page.

Given the state’s budget crunch, the state Department of Education has released no companion curriculum or textbook revisions to comply with the FAIR Education Act, which requires schools to include the contributions of “lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender Americans” in instruction programs and curricula at all grade levels.

The law, which evolved from Senate Bill 48, also outlaws instruction materials “reflecting adversely” on those individuals. The act also adds “persons with disabilities” to the list.

But the Legislature has pushed back the financially strapped state’s next curriculum revision and textbook purchase to 2015. Until then, school districts have been given the go-ahead to decide how to carry out the law on their own, said Tom Adams, the state’s director of curriculum frameworks.

“If a school district wants to move forward on implementing this, they can,” Mr. Adams said.

The result: The state now has more than 1,000 discrete school districts attempting to design and implement what may be the most controversial curriculum change in state history. What’s more, they’re doing it - or not doing it - under the watchful eyes of both gay-rights advocates and conservative critics, all against the backdrop of a signature-gathering campaign to reverse the law.

“We feel they’ve really overreached on this,” said Karen England, who is heading “Stop SB 48,” a petition drive aimed at putting a proposed repeal of the law before voters in November. “We’re confident that the more people hear and the more advocates push this, the more there’s going to be a backlash.”

The Los Angeles Unified School District has been cited as the gold standard in broadening its curriculum to include SB 48. In September, the district set a 60-day deadline to develop a curriculum that would include “making available age-appropriate LGBT inclusive curriculum for elementary and secondary schools.”

Most school districts, however, are still in the discussion phase. At the El Dorado Union School District, for example, “we’ve started having conversations with our staff,” said superintendent Christopher Hoffman.

Mr. Hoffman said that what frustrates him is the state has provided no new funding to comply with SB 48. What’s more, the implementation comes at the same time that the schools are wrestling with mandates in the recently adopted Common Core State Standards.

“The mandates keep coming through, but they keep reducing our funding. It’s been reduced by about 20 percent over the last few years,” said Mr. Hoffman. “There’s nothing directly coming from the state, so we’re basically coming up with this on our own.”

The lack of coordination prompted the Los Angeles Times to blast the Legislature for approving SB 48 even though “the state lacks the time or resources to develop lesson plans or a curriculum to help guide them.”

“This is what happens when school laws are passed for political reasons rather than educational ones,” the Times said in an Oct. 19 editorial.

For gay-rights advocates such as Courage Campaign Chairman Rick Jacobs, who fought to pass SB 48, the absence of state effort in implementing the law is troubling.

“I’m concerned in the sense that the law is the law and it’s supposed to be literally in effect, not just on the books,” said Mr. Jacobs. “I feel the Department of Education should be much more aggressive on this. OK, not all the financial resources are together, but they could be doing what we’re doing.”

Story Continues →

© Copyright 2012 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.