- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Romney taking heat on amnesty question
Non-response election liability
Question of the Day
The past two weeks have offered Mitt Romney numerous opportunities to clarify his stance on immigration — and every time the presumptive Republican presidential nominee has taken a pass.
Looking to run out the clock before the November election without getting entangled in tough issues, Mr. Romney has settled on a go-to answer when he’s asked about immigration, health care, women’s pay or other thorny policy questions: President Obama is trying to change the conversation away from his record on the economy.
“Last time around, as you recall, his campaign slogan was hope and change,” Mr. Romney said at a recent campaign stop in Pennsylvania. “Now I think he’d like to change it to ‘hoping to change the subject.’ He’s not wanting to talk about the economy like I want to talk to the economy, because what I want to do — I want to get America working again. I want to create more good jobs for Americans.”
While both parties generally agree November’s election will turn on the nation’s economic health, some Republicans warn that Mr. Romney will have to eventually face some of the tough policy issues he’s been putting off - and none may be more critical than immigration.
“I believe Mitt Romney has to provide a specific plan on immigration that ties to a broader vision, and to a coherent economic framework,” said Mark McKinnon, a former campaign adviser to President George W. Bush. “If he does, I think he can win. If he doesn’t, I think it could be fatal.”
President Obama turned up the heat on Mr. Romney two weeks ago when he directed the Homeland Security Department to stop deporting many young illegal immigrants. On Monday, the Supreme Court thrust the issue further into the national spotlight when it struck down most of Arizona’s tough immigration law.
Since the Obama announcement, Mr. Romney has refused to say whether he would keep Mr. Obama’s directive in place while he and Congress worked on a reform bill.
Then in the wake of the high court’s ruling, a Romney spokesman dodged questions when asked to explain which parts of the Arizona law his boss backed.
“I think the common thread on his immigration responses since the primary has been that he is talking in politicalspeak, which means he has perfected the art of saying something without saying anything,” said Ana Navarro, a Republican strategist who served as co-chairwoman of Sen. John McCain’s National Hispanic Advisory Council during his 2008 presidential campaign.
“I think Mitt Romney can tap dance his way around the immigration issue until November, but he will pay a price with it. Not only with Latinos, but with other voters. Trepidation, ambiguity and equivocation are not qualities that the American people look for in a president,” she said.
More than four months from Election Day, Mr. Romney still appears to have his work cut out for him when it comes to wooing Hispanic voters. A USA Today-Gallup poll released this week shows that he trails Mr. Obama by a 66 percent to 25 percent margin among this increasingly important slice of the electorate.
Speaking to supporters in Salem, Va., on Tuesday, Mr. Romney once again glossed over the topic of immigration, arguing that the only reason the Supreme Court had to get involved in the Arizona law is that Mr. Obama has failed to lead on the issue.
Then he laid out his plans for how he will handle the fallout from the Supreme Court’s coming ruling on the constitutionality of the president’s health care overhaul.
“If Obamacare is not deemed constitutional, then the first 3 1/2 years of this president’s term will have been wasted on something that’s not helped the American people,” the former Massachusetts governor said. “If it is deemed to stand, then I will tell you one thing, we are going to have to have a president, and I’m that one, who is going to get rid of Obamacare. We are going to stop it on Day One.”
Mr. Romney will be on Northern Virginia on Wednesday - wrapping up a two-day swing that underscores the state’s importance in the Electoral College math this year.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- GOP 2014: Republican governors cite their economic stewardship
- Perdue, Nunn square off in race for Georgia's open Senate seat
- David Perdue defeats Jack Kingston in Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff
- Alison Lundergan Grimes hits Mitch McConnell over jobs
- Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff locked in dead heat
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- Family of Marine killed in Afghanistan pushes back against cover-up
- Pentagon running out of time to find mass of missing weapons in Afghanistan
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama family set to buy $4.25M desert home in California: report
- ORTEL: Note to Janet Yellen: The American bubble is popping
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq