- John Podesta eats crow: ‘I apologize to Speaker Boehner’
- U.S., China race to finish line on ‘invisibility cloak’
- Obama ‘cavalier’ in hiding foreign aid order, judge rules
- Prince Charles: Muslims are driving Christians from Mideast through persecution
- Gitmo’s first commander: Close the prison down
- Google’s newest photography find: Just wink and shoot
- Detroit’s Heidelberg art project hit by 8 fires in 8 months
- Pa. police pull people over for random DNA tests for feds
- NASA pushing hard to get back into space game
- Harvard student to face federal charges for bomb hoax
New limits put on D.C. medical marijuana
Growing centers further restricted
Question of the Day
The D.C. Council on Tuesday imposed new limits on the city’s medical marijuana program about two weeks before the long-awaited initiative is expected to begin in earnest.
Lawmakers approved a proposal, through a 9-3 vote, that bans cultivation centers from opening in “retail priority areas” flagged for development on pockets of land across the District. Any applicants affected by the legislation can change their location within 180 days without it harming their request for registration from the city’s Department of Health to grow or sell the drug.
The legislation from council member Yvette M. Alexander, Ward 7 Democrat, will apply citywide. But the issue was spawned by complaints about a warehouse south of Benning Road in her ward, where up to 95 marijuana plants would be grown if one applicant obtains a registration this month.
Debate on the measure was wideranging and confusing at times, with Ms. Alexander calling up her own measure for reconsideration, even though it had passed, because she realized an amendment by council member Phil Mendelson, at-large Democrat, would not mandate that cultivation centers relocate from retail-priority areas.
“It just destroyed the intent of the bill,” she said of the amendment, which removed the language on retail areas and focused on allowing cultivation centers to relocate without facing a penalty.
The bill appears most directly to affect Phyto Management — the applicant that picked a spot between Minnesota Avenue and Interstate 295 in Ward 7 — although it was written with all applicants in mind.
Phyto’s principal, who is still waiting for registration from the city, declined to comment on the council’s actions on Tuesday.
“They are willing to relocate,” Ms. Alexander said from the dais, noting she is committed to helping Phyto find a new location.
Mr. Mendelson and council member David A. Catania, at-large independent, raised objections to altering the tightly regulated medical marijuana program that has been in the making since 1998, when city voters approved the program in a referendum before congressional intervention delayed its implementation for more than a decade.
The council members, who oversee judiciary and health matters, played a key role in crafting medical marijuana regulations in recent years. The Department of Health is slated to award up to 10 registrations to cultivation centers on March 30 and up to five registrations for dispensary centers — where the drug is doled out — by June 8.
Mr. Catania said objections to cultivation centers “pales in comparison to the controversy that is coming when we have to take up the issue of dispensaries.”
“A cultivation center is simply a warehouse,” he said. “It’s fully self-contained, there is no obvious evidence of what is taking place inside, so therefore I don’t really feel it’s going to impede the economic development of a community.”
Some council members were concerned about placing additional restrictions on the program, after the body’s decision in January to restrict the number of medical marijuana sites per ward to assuage Ward 5 residents who felt they were taking too many of the cultivation centers.
Based on existing applications, the restriction limited the number of possible cultivation centers to seven, or six in Ward 5 and one in Ward 7. The number could be cut to six if Phyto Management runs into problems relocating.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Sen. Cochran files bill to repeal Obamacare if more lose coverage than gain
- Top insurers' group: Obamacare customers have 10 more days to pay first premium
- Pelosi raises alarm over handling of classified Obamacare documents
- GOP lawmaker: Best 'fix' for Obamacare is a mercy killing
- GOP, Dem lawmakers unite in call for women's history museum
Latest Blog Entries
- Rep. Issa, White House fight over Obamacare website's security
- Lawmakers: Time to recognize women's history through a national museum
- White House calls attention to HealthCare.gov as key deadline looms
- RNC Chairman Priebus: Conservative groups are 'asset,' despite what Boehner says
- Obama's job approval reaches all-time low in Iowa, could affect Senate race: poll
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- Half of America strips religion from Christmas
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- Zadzooks: The Joker sixth scale figure review (Sideshow Collectibles)
- Pa. police pull people over for random DNA tests for feds
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Rush weighs in: Maybe Republicans dont dislike Obamacare
- 'Duck Dynasty' star Phil Robertson: Gays 'wont inherit the kingdom of God'
- Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Right-brain investing in a left-brain world. You can do it. I can help.
News and views on the Civil War.
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow