- Congressman: McAuliffe victory means gun control a winning message
- Clinton aide admits soliciting disgraced D.C. fundraiser; says actions were legal
- Joel Osteen church victimized in $600K theft
- Obama goes shopping at Gap as minimum-wage thanks
- N.J. woman charged after client dies from black-market butt injections
- CIA chief Brennan ‘determined’ to speak out more this year
- Reset? What reset? U.S.-Russia ties at worst since Cold War
- 9/11 terror recruiter released in Syrian prisoner swap
- D.C. elections board gives green light to marijuana legalization initiative
- Elephants can tell difference between human languages: study
MILLER: Paul Ryan’s window of opportunity
Capitol Hill must cut spending to avoid debt crisis
Nobody spends borrowed money faster than Washington. Lawmakers blew through $232 billion in February alone, spending their most recent $1.2 trillion loan at breakneck speed. House Speaker John A. Boehner insisted last summer on making dollar-for-dollar cuts in return for increasing the federal government’s borrowing limit, but, so far, not a buck has been matched in actual deficit reduction. Mr. Boehner’s push for fiscal responsibility took center stage as the House began its work Wednesday on the 2013 budget.
Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan’s spending blueprint starts the process of a major reconciliation bill with actual entitlement reform expedited for a floor vote in May. While President Obama agreed in concept to Mr. Boehner’s demand for restraint, he wanted tax hikes to make up the difference.
Their final deal punted the decision on cuts to a supercommittee, with a trigger mechanism in place to automatically sequester funds for 10 years if it failed to meet deficit-reduction targets. The sequester was Mr. Obama’s way of forcing Republicans to cave on tax hikes to avoid half of the cuts hitting national defense.
Democrats are pretending the sequester won’t happen so they can keep borrowing money without consequences. The White House budget said the sequester should be replaced with tax hikes, but it gave no concrete mechanism for accounting for the first $98 billion in deficit reduction. Mr. Obama thus leaves open the possibility of the military getting smacked with a $55 billion cut at the beginning of 2013, while troops are still fighting in Afghanistan.
Mr. Ryan gave reconciliation instructions to six committees to find at least $18 billion in deficit reduction next year and $116 billion over five years. His suggestions for saving money included means testing entitlements and making federal employees’ pensions more like the private sector. Because a reconciliation bill cannot be filibustered, it would need just a handful of Democratic votes to clear the Senate, creating a real opportunity for change. This is the only way for Congress to stop automatically funding those programs year after year, regardless of the expense.
Some conservative members of the GOP caucus don’t want to wait five years. Budget Committee member Rep. Justin Amash, Michigan Republican, may vote against the bill because of the way the sequester is handled. An aide to another conservative member explained the problem, saying, “We should cut $100 billion in this year, like the debt-ceiling deal requires, instead of delaying and spreading it out over the next five years. What stops us from delaying the cuts again next year?”
Mr. Ryan could have resorted to Washington gimmicks to pay for the sequester by counting the savings from repealing Obamacare immediately. Its repeal would save far more than $98 billion, but the benefit wouldn’t kick in for a few years. Mr. Ryan’s plan of pushing for changes to the ordinarily untouchable mandatory spending programs is a smart move that should be embraced.
Emily Miller is a senior editor for the Opinion pages at The Washington Times.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Emily Miller is senior editor of opinion for The Washington Times. She is the author of “Emily Gets Her Gun … But Obama Wants to Take Yours” (Regnery 2013). Miller won the 2012 Clark Mollenhoff Award for Investigative Reporting from the Institute on Political Journalism.
- MILLER: Donald Trump says he’s a Tea Party member
- MILLER: CPAC debates Tea Party or moderate for 2016 Republican presidential candidate
- MILLER: Huge majorities on East Coast support national gun registry
- MILLER: NRA to score Senate vote on Obama’s nominee for surgeon general, Vivec Murthy
- MILLER: New Jersey bill is outright gun ban on .22-caliber rifles and leads to confiscation
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
An America drowning in red ink is the land of the free no more
Get Breaking Alerts
- David Jolly wins in Florida, GOP keeps swing district seat
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- House Democrats trying to force unemployment insurance vote
- Redskins bypass big splash - for now - as free agency period begins
- Hillary Clinton campaign received funds from Jeffrey Thompson
- FCC targets black conservative in TV station fight
- Atheists sue to remove 'Ground Zero Cross' from 9/11 museum
- Sharyl Attkisson resigns from CBS after months of talks
- 80 people publicly executed across North Korea for films, Bibles
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- CARNES: Kissinger's flawed and offensive analysis of Ukraine
- FEULNER: Civic involvement, not big government, empowers Americans
- BLACKWELL: Obama fumbles key to saving minority youth
- RAHN: The responsibility to resist fiscally irresponsible politicians
- GANS: Obamacare's latest casualty: rehabilitative hospitals
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama delivering on 'flexibility' vow to Moscow
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama should've seen Ukraine coming
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Political correctness is enemy of free speech
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Stop wasting money on United Nations
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Certain issues belong to voters