Continued from page 1

The strategic partnership document is critical to define the U.S. commitment to aid and development in Afghanistan after 2014, when most international combat forces are to leave. It is also considered a precursor to a status of forces agreement that will govern the presence and role of U.S. forces in the country after 2014. The U.S. is expected to keep about 20,000 troops in Afghanistan past 2014 in counterterrorism and training roles.

A U.S. embassy spokesman, Gavin Sundwall, told The Associated Press that the Americans valued an agreement, but not so much that they preferred a bad deal to no deal at all.

“We still are committed to a strategic partnership with the Afghan people, which we believe is in both our countries’ interest to achieve our joint mission and ensure that Afghanistan cannot become a safe haven for terrorists again,” Sundwall said.

“We have always said it is more important to get the right agreement than to get an agreement.”

The comment was the first indication that the United States might be pushing back at what many consider to be Karzai’s intransigence on the issue of detainees and night raids. Karzai has increasingly been hardening his position and pushing his agenda with incidents such as the Quran burnings.

“I think there is a growing understanding in Washington …. that they cannot sign the agreement with Karzai,” Moradian said. “My assessment is that they are contemplating signing it with the next president of the country. At the moment that this poison atmosphere exists between Karzai and Washington, there a logic” to delay the signing until a new president is replaced.

Karzai was re-elected in 2009 and his five-year term expires in 2014. He is barred under Afghanistan’s constitution from running for a third.

Karzai and U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker were to meet late Monday to discuss a variety of issues, one of the Afghan officials said. The two regularly meet twice a week to discuss current issues in the U.S.-Afghan relationship, but the partnership deal was likely to monopolize the Monday meeting.

Karzai has demanded that the Parwan Detention Facility be handed over on March 9. Afghan officials say privately that a U.S. proposal to hand over the facility in six months would be acceptable to some in the Karzai government, but that the president had not yet embraced the idea.

“The United States has repeatedly made clear that it is committed to working with the Afghan government to complete a transition of detention operations in Afghanistan in a manner that is safe and orderly and in accordance with our international legal obligations,” Sundwall said.

U.S. military officials have repeatedly said that the date for handing over the Parwan facility would be based on the ability of the Afghan government to run it.

The Americans have stood strong on the need for night raids, saying that the operations are one of its most effective tools for finding and capturing insurgents, especially with fewer conventional forces.

Karzai has said that Afghans should be the only ones doing night raids because the invasion of privacy from troops entering a families’ home is compounded when the soldiers are Westerners. He has also said that too many of these night raids have resulted in civilian deaths or the detention of non-insurgents.

He said Karzai views having foreign forces in charge of Afghan detainees as a symbolic affront to Afghan sovereignty. Moradian said another reason might be that he thinks he can use detainees as leverage in any peace talks with the Taliban.

“When it comes to the peace negotiation, he would have some degree of control on the detainees,” Moradian said. “He wants to make sure he has the detainee cards to play with.”

Story Continues →