- Iran’s Rouhani: Israel, Islamic State are ‘tumors derived from the same origin’
- Rep. Tim Murphy: GOP knew HealthCare.gov would be an ‘unmitigated disaster’
- Political speak: Planned Parenthood dumps ‘pro-choice’ for ‘women’s health’
- U.S. attorney warns Cuomo not to interfere with anti-corruption probes
- Investigators reach Ukraine jet crash site
- Ohio gives Obama a thumbs down; Hillary Clinton tops GOP all-stars: poll
- Jesse Ventura suggests suit not over; HarperCollins could be next
- ‘No American is proud’ of certain CIA tactics: State Department
- Drug-filled drone crash outside S.C. prison sends police on alert
- GOP to Obama: Take your ‘golf cap off’ and get down to coal country
Some players on ATP Tour want to speed it up
Question of the Day
INDIAN WELLS, CALIF. (AP) - Some players at the BNP Paribas Open say chair umpires need to be more diligent about enforcing rules about time allowed between points.
The length of the recent Australian Open final between Novak Djokovic and Rafael Nadal, which took 5 hours, 53 minutes to complete, had some wondering what was taking so long. Turns out both players often took as much as 30 seconds in between points.
Rules state players are allowed 20 seconds between points in the four Grand Slam tournaments and 25 seconds in ATP Tour events. But like the slow-play rules in golf, they are enforced inconsistently.
Roger Federer, who plays fairly quickly, says he thinks officials "are being too loose," about policing the time limit and admits to having wondered "how you can go through a 4-hour match with Rafa (Nadal) and him never getting a time violation."
Americans Andy Roddick, Robby Ginepri and Michael Russell told USA Today that they would be in favor of an electronic shot-clock like those used in basketball. But Roddick also said that, like children stretching their parents' tolerance, the players are getting away with taking too much time because the officials are allowing it.
Enric Molina Mur, the head of officiating for the International Tennis Federation, which governs the Grand Slams, said there obviously are instances when the rule is not being properly enforced. But Gayle Bradshaw, who oversees rules and competition for the ATP Tour, told the newspaper that consistency is a problem "because sometimes 20 seconds is more than adequate and sometimes 25 seconds is clearly not long enough."
That's Nadal's position, too.
He said Thursday that he has "had a lot of warnings in my time and I've accepted it, almost every one, because sometimes they are right. That's part of the game.
"If they say it's 15 seconds it's 15 seconds. In normal conditions, yes. But you have to understand how the match goes" and whether or not the energy expended during a point merits additional recovery time, "and that's the work of the umpire, in my opinion."
By Ted Cruz
Israel saves its enemies; Hamas endangers its friends
- Al Gore's climate-changers at EPA hearings foiled by cool temperatures
- Geraldo Rivera: Matt Drudge 'doing his best to stir up a civil war'
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- GOP report sees ties between rich donors, green 'nonprofits'
- NAPOLITANO: Is the president incompetent or lawless?
- Lois Lerner hated conservatives, new emails show
- EDITORIAL: The real Lois Lerner exposed in newly released emails
- House votes to sue President Obama over claims of presidential power
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- 'Big Bang' star Mayim Bialik helps send bulletproof vests to IDF
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world