- South Carolina sheriff refuses to lower American flag for Nelson Mandela
- South Africans hold day of prayer for Nelson Mandela
- Mandela not on life support in final hours, friend says
- Ukraine protesters topple, decapitate Lenin statue in Kiev
- Kim Jong-un’s uncle removed from North Korean state documentary
- Thailand crisis deepens as opposition quits Parliament
- Campbell Soup apologizes for SpaghettiOs’ Pearl Harbor tweet
- Former Reagan aide James Baker: President regretted apartheid veto
- Some donations to gay waitress who allegedly forged hate note refunded
- German President Joachim Gauck boycotting Sochi Olympics
GOLDBERG: False modesty of the ‘nerds’
Call Washingtonians by their real ID - wannabes
Washington is full of nerds. I know. I speak nerd, not fluently mind you, at least not anymore. But I certainly know more than a few phrases memorized from a Berlitz nerd-to-English phrase book. I can talk Dungeons & Dragons (both D&D and AD&D). I know about the Golden Age of Comics (as in comic books - if you thought that was a reference to Bob Newhart’s heyday, subtract 20 nerd points right there).
Anyway, if you spend any time in Washington you’ll find nerds. What happens is most of them sublimate their fixations with comics, baseball cards or 1960s British comedies to policy minutiae and political arcana. But, like Christians in ancient Rome, you can still spot them if you know the signals.
Some are quite successful. I once spent a half-hour with one of the most respected (liberal) political analysts in Washington talking about “Buffy the Vampire Slayer.” It was like discovering he was from my homeland. Or consider Paul Krugman; I strongly suspect that the Nobel Prize winner and New York Times columnist is a nerd. He says he was inspired to become an economist, by the “psychohistorians” in Isaac Asimov’s “Foundation” novels. Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont Democrat, is a Batman fanatic.
But these and other examples notwithstanding, nerds tend not to be “front-of-the-store” types. In “The 40-Year-Old Virgin,” Steve Carell spent most of his career working the backroom because it’s understood that’s where people like him belong.
The same goes in Washington. The vast majority of the nerds crunch the numbers for the politicians and news anchors. They explain why the stats are important to people like, say, NBC’s David Gregory, who seems to be biding his time until he can achieve his real dream of hosting “Entertainment Tonight.”
Many of the beautiful women you see on TV aren’t nerds. That doesn’t mean they’re not smart. But even if they were study geeks in high school, that doesn’t mean they were nerds. In the movie “Election,” Reese Witherspoon plays an earnest, dorky, driven young woman, but she’s not a nerd. Holly Hunter in “Broadcast News” isn’t one either - she’s a maniacally self-serious bore. Tina Fey in “30 Rock”? All nerd, baby.
So why am I telling you this? Because, suddenly, we’re supposed to call the White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner the “nerd prom.” Hundreds of media outlets have recycled that description.
Frankly, I find it offensive. George Clooney doesn’t go to “nerd proms.” Nor do Kim Kardashian and Lindsay Lohan. I’ve been to a half-dozen correspondents’ dinners, and nerds were far less represented than rent-seeking K Street sleazeballs, social-climbing poseurs and power-hungry pols of all parties.
Look, everything is relative, and social distinctions tend to matter only at your own level and above. If you’re the prom queen or the captain of the football team, everyone outside your clique is a nerd. And if you’re the czar, everyone outside the royal court is a peasant. For good reasons and bad, Washington is a magnet for sports stars, war heroes and businessmen. That doesn’t make them nerds.
We have never had a nerd president. All of them tend to have a mixture of resentment, admiration and contempt for the nerds. And that goes especially for Barack Obama, who, more than most others, seems to care deeply about appearing cool.
The elitist D.C. press corps calls its annual gala the “nerd prom” because it sounds self-deprecating around the Hollywood stars and New York bigwigs (while actually playing on their insecurities) and the politicians. They admire the former for being more famous than they are, and resent the latter for being more famous than they are.
It’s vanity-as-branding. What they’re really trying to say is: “The only difference between this and the Oscars is we’re really smart.” It’s of a piece with the seemingly self-deprecating, but really self-serving, slogan “Washington is Hollywood for ugly people.” No, it’s really not.
Now don’t get me wrong. I also have contempt for the people who flock to the dinner in order to cozy up to power for the sake of bragging about cozying up to power. In his mixed performance at this year’s “nerd prom,” late-night host Jimmy Kimmel said, “Everything that is wrong with America is here in this room.” He was right. He wasn’t talking about the nerds.
Jonah Goldberg is editor at large of National Review Online, a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and author of the forthcoming book “The Tyranny of Cliches” (Sentinel HC, May, 2012).
Get Breaking Alerts
- Obama: Hole U.S. 'digging out of' requires billions more in unemployment benefits
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- Sen. Rand Paul: Supreme Court needs to re-examine Fourth Amendment
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality
- 'Dude, I'm dreading that I will have to go': Czech prime minister on Mandela funeral
- Sen. Richard Durbin: No line in the sand on unemployment benefits
- Kill team: Obama war chiefs widen drone death zones