Warning that more than 2 million Americans are poised to lose their long-term unemployment insurance, some Democrats are calling on Congress to extend the “economic lifeline” before it expires next month.
Some Republicans, though, are demanding that an extension of jobless benefits — and any other form of new spending — be offset through savings or spending reductions elsewhere in the federal budget.
In a letter to party leaders last week, Sen. Jeff Sessions said that extending the unemployment benefits another year carries a $26 billion price tag.
Couple that with the cost of keeping the 2 percent payroll tax cut on the books and averting a cut in payments to doctors who treat Medicare patients and the Alabama Republican said that the bill for new spending rises to nearly $130 billion.
“Offsets for any of these changes must also be achieved through real savings, not gimmicks,” Mr. Sessions said.
Scheduled to expire the final week of December, the fate of the unemployment benefits, which go to workers who lost full-time work through no fault of their own, are tied up in the broader discussion on Capitol Hill over the “fiscal cliff.”
Lawmakers are trying to strike a deal by Jan. 1, when the 2001 income tax rate cuts expire and the 2003 cuts to dividends and capital-gains taxes also expire. On Jan. 2, $110 billion in automatic spending cuts, known as “sequesters,” take effect under the terms of last year’s bipartisan debt deal.
The extension of benefits for out-of-work Americans has been a thorny issue on Capitol Hill, where Republicans have argued that it increases people’s dependency on the federal government and in some cases serves as a disincentive for people to find work, prolonging their unemployment.
Democrats, meanwhile, say that the unemployment benefits offer a good bang for their buck, reduce the number of Americans living in poverty and stimulate the economy.
On more than one occasion, President George W. Bush agreed to extend jobless benefits, including in 2008, when the economy slowed and the number of people filing for unemployment insurance reached a 16-year high.
Since then, President Obama and Congress have extended the benefits in 2009, 2010 and last year.
Less than a week after the 2012 election, Rep. Sander M. Levin, the ranking Democrat on the powerful House Ways and Means Committee, released a report that said that more than 2 million Americans are at risk of losing their unemployment benefits after Christmas.
“Maintaining these benefits for workers who have lost their jobs through no fault of their own is critically important to the economic security of millions of Americans, and more broadly, to the continued recovery of the U.S. economy,” Mr. Levin said, calling on Congress to “act promptly to continue this economic lifeline.”
Mr. Zandi told The Washington Times that he would extend the benefits as constructed for another year as part of a broader package that put the nation on a path toward fiscal sustainability that addressed the nation’s deficit.View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
By Andrew P. Napolitano
The president's men trash the Constitution to pursue antagonists
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
Are there profound differences between the Left and the Right? You betcha.
Wall Street news before (and occasionally after) the opening bell.
A politically conservative and morally liberal Hebrew alpha male hunts left-wing viper
Implement these actionable tips, how-to’s and best practices in 10 minutes or less to leverage online communications and technology for brand, business and career development.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention