- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
- ISTOOK: IRS “wants to throw us in jail,” says tea party leader
- Easter woes: Chocolate costs soar, becoming ‘unaffordable’ luxury
- Michaels craft chain confirms hackers hit 3M customers
- Special Forces’ suicide rates hit record levels — casualties of ‘hard combat’
- Many Americans would quickly face financial hardship after losing job, poll shows
D.C. last in nation in rate of high school graduation
Maryland, Va. among highest
The nation’s capital had the worst four-year high school graduation rate in the country in 2010-2011, a finding that suggests the city has more work to do to reform its historically troubled school system.
Touting the use of a “common, rigorous measure” across the states for the first time, the U.S. Department of Education said in a report released this week that the District had a graduation rate of 59 percent, placing it behind Nevada’s rate of 62 percent. Iowa fared the best, with an 88 percent graduation rate. Maryland reported an 83 percent graduation rate, while Virginia had an 82 percent rate.
States in the top half of the report posted rates between 80 percent and 88 percent, while 25 other states reported between the District’s rate of 59 percent and the 78 percent rate shared by Arizona, Delaware and North Carolina.
The annual graduation measurement is significant this year because for the first time federal officials based the figures off the number of students who graduate in four years rather than allowing the states to define their own rates. Twenty-six states reported lower graduation rates, while 24 states either increased their rates or remained the same.
“By using this new measure, states will be more honest in holding schools accountable and ensuring that students succeed,” U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said.
Under the new measure, the District’s graduation rate decreased from 76 percent in 2009-2010.
D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson, a Democrat, noted the difficulty of comparing the District’s strictly urban school district to geographically diverse systems in states across the country.
“We consider ourselves a state and we’re treated as a state in many regards. At the same time to make a comparison between us and let’s say, Wyoming — which is completely rural — one has to be mindful that that comparison will not hold all the time.”
Traditional public schools and charter schools in the District have shown steady, yet slow, gains in annual standardized exams. Yet fewer than half of the city’s public school students were proficient in math and reading, according to the 2012 results of its D.C. Comprehensive Assessment System.
The education department’s figures arrive as the D.C. Public Schools officials and city lawmakers mull a controversial proposal to close nearly 20 schools across the District, including one high school. By consolidating students into fewer buildings, the system can devote its resources to educational programs, according to D.C. Schools Chancellor Kaya Henderson.
Ms. Henderson is shepherding the system through its reforms in the wake of former chancellor Michelle A. Rhee, a nationally renowned and polarizing figure who charged forward with sweeping reforms — including school closures and firings of principals and teachers — during her tenure under then- Mayor Adrian M. Fenty.
“The bottom line, though, is that the graduation rates are poor,” Mr. Mendelson said. “The goal should be that every kid who enters the ninth grade will graduate from high school.”
Grover J. “Russ” Whitehurst, director of the Brown Center on Education Policy for the Brookings Institution, said while it was good that states are being required to report a uniform graduation rate, “it seems to me to have some obvious flaws.”
His skepticism, Mr. Whitehurst said, lies in the comparison between numbers the Department of Education presented and figures used by the National Center for Education Statistics, which on its website calls itself the “primary federal entity for collecting and analyzing data related to education.”
“It’s supposed to be measuring the same thing, but there’s a big difference in the two sets of numbers,” Mr. Whitehurst said. “That raises issues of which numbers should we be believing.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Meredith Somers is a Metro reporter for The Washington Times. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- No rest for the retired: Cardinal McCarrick on a mission for peace in Africa
- The sun also rises on Easter in the District
- Higher Ground: Colbert the Catholic
- Feeling taxed today? How about a prayer to St. Matthew?
- 'Matzah Factory' provides hands-on experience for learning about Passover
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
- Harry Reid blasts Bundy ranch supporters as 'domestic terrorists'
- Immigration still on hold: Boehner's office
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
- Supreme Court weighs appeal to concealed-carry gun laws
- Nancy Pelosi washes immigrants' feet in humble Holy Week act then promotes on Twitter
- PRUDEN: When a bored president just 'mails it in'
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- BRUCE: Obama deliberately emboldening America's enemies
- Joe Biden's biggest gaffe: VP blowing his 2016 head start
- Jews being told to register in Ukraine: John Kerry
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.