- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
Women press to end combat ban
Four in military say restriction is limiting careers
Question of the Day
Four female members of the armed services have filed a lawsuit against the Defense Department, saying its “outdated” ban on women serving in combat is unconstitutional and hurts their military careers.
The women’s lawsuit comes as the Pentagon is considering opening more positions to female service members.
Earlier this year, Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta opened to women 14,000 jobs that had been male-only assignments. He ordered each of the services to look into other jobs that could be opened and report back to him before the end of this month.
Pentagon press secretary George Little declined to comment on the lawsuit, but said the recent openings “are merely the beginning and not the end of a process, and we expect that process to continue.”
Critics say women on average are not physically built for ground combat, and placing them in combat would hurt cohesion in an all-male units.
“All of the men I’ve ever served with have a protector instinct, and I can assure you that that instinct would be immediately directed to the woman on the team,” retired Army Col. Jeff Struecker, a former Ranger, said in an interview earlier this year. “If something happened to her, it would devastate the men on the team in ways that wouldn’t devastate them if it was their best friend and it was a guy.”
One of the plaintiffs, Maj. Hegar, a helicopter pilot, said she experienced no acts of chivalry when her plane was shot down on a search-and-rescue mission with special forces in 2009.
Her seven-person crew was on a mission to rescue three injured U.S. troops who were hit with a roadside bomb. As their helicopter landed next to the convoy, they were ambushed.
“This whole thing was set up as a trap for medevac helicopters,” Maj. Hegar said.
Her crew brought the wounded on board, but as they lifted off, they realized they wouldn’t make it back to the base and decided to land.
The crew secured a perimeter around the aircraft. Maj. Hegar, realizing the wounded had no body armor, shielded them with her own body. A small reconnaissance aircraft later extracted them from the landing site.
“They absolutely did not treat me like I was a weaker person who was to be protected,” Maj. Hegar said of her crew. “There was no excessive chivalry or trying to take care of me.”
Maj. Hegar was awarded the Purple Heart and the Distinguished Flying Cross with a Valor Device, two of the highest decorations for a pilot.
Maj. Hegar said her lawsuit is not intended to dictate to the services how they should operate but encourage the Defense Department to lift restrictions on military commanders who have “found themselves in the difficult position of needing to use highly talented and qualified women in combat and not being able to.”
But since her team was designated as “temporary,” Capt. Bedell and other female Marines had to return to the main forward operating base every 45 days, which took them away from missions for up to a week.
The lawsuit cites discrimination in the combat-exclusion policy, noting that women do not receive official recognition for having served in combat because they can only be “attached,” not “assigned,” to combat units.
“Women are barred from more than 238,000 positions across the armed forces, including all infantry positions, and from certain military occupational specialties and training schools,” the lawsuit states.
The ACLU’s Ms. Migdal said Tuesday that “servicewomen who have been spending the last 10 years trying to accomplish missions in Iraq and Afghanistan are coming back and seeing there really is a brass ceiling.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Kristina Wong is a national security reporter for The Washington Times, covering defense, foreign policy and intelligence affairs. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- Despite Pentagon cuts and eye on Pacific, Air Force implored to save the 'Warthog'
- Rep. Hunter to Pentagon: Don't lower combat standards for women
- Pentagon welcomes budget deal but says more defense spending needed
- Hagel renews Qatar defense pact despite differences over Iran, Syria
- Scientists raise alarm over plan to destroy Syria's chemical weapons at sea
TWT Video Picks
By David Keene
Allowing states to innovate could reduce dependency on bureaucracy
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- White House defends Kerry failure to broker Middle East cease-fire
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia's gay marriage ban
- Federal judge rules D.C. ban on handguns in public is unconstitutional
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq