- PHILLIPS: The benefits of defying ‘common wisdom’
- Judge strikes down Arkansas abortion law — nation’s toughest — as unconstitutional
- Court: Tenn. must recognize 3 same-sex marriages
- Russia claims to have downed U.S. drone over Crimea region; Pentagon denies
- John Daly shoots 90 at PGA Tour event: ‘I’m falling apart’
- Police: Man arrested in West Virginia may be linked to Alexandria killings
- Smile: Equipping cops with body-mounted cameras gains steam in Calif., N.Y.
- Obama to sign bill cutting taxpayer money for party conventions
- Half of Americans worried about second Cold War: poll
- Kermit Gosnell clinic aide who heard aborted baby scream gets 5 to 10 years in prison
Muslim uprisings open gates for al Qaeda
The recent wave of anti-West demonstrations across the Muslim world and the attack that killed four Americans in Libya have triggered mounting concern among analysts and U.S. officials that al Qaeda is exploiting the chaos that has followed the Arab Spring’s overthrow of secular dictatorships aligned with the United States.
Al Qaeda’s affiliate in North Africa has been linked to the Sept. 11 military-style assault on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.
The demonstrations, in which violent but unarmed mobs stormed the U.S. and other Western embassies, generally were reported to be spontaneous expressions of outrage over an Internet video that denigrates Islam’s Prophet Muhammad.
The report’s authors say al Qaeda’s senior leadership is taking advantage of the way the rebellions have “disrupted existing counterterrorism capabilities.”
In addition, Thomas Joscelyn, a terrorism analyst at the hawkish Foundation for the Defense of Democracy, said that “there are not too many dots to join” to link high-profile al Qaeda supporters to the demonstrations in the Arab world:
• In Cairo on Sept. 11, protesters breached the U.S. Embassy’s walls, burned the American flag and raised an Islamic battle standard used by al Qaeda.
• In the Yemeni capital of Sanaa two days later, protests at the U.S. Embassy were sparked by a call from Abdul Majid al-Zindani, a Muslim cleric who was named as a “specially designated global terrorist” by the Treasury Department in 2004 because of his links to bin Laden.
Five demonstrators were killed, as the mob clashed with Yemeni security forces protecting the embassy.
An idea and a movement
“I’m not saying that all these demonstrations were ordered by al Qaeda central,” he said. “The evidence isn’t there for that.
Others agree that the demonstrations show, at the least, the resonance of al Qaeda’s violent interpretation of Islam.
The mob attacks “show the resiliency of their nihilistic ideology” in the Arab world, said a U.S. government counterterrorism official who asked not to be named because he is not authorized to speak to the news media.
The diffusion of al Qaeda’s ideology and the proliferation of its affiliates have led some to detect a rebirth of the terrorist network.
“They’re a greater threat than they were back on Sept. 11,” Rep. Peter T. King, New York Republican and chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, said this week.
Al Qaeda “has now spread out into many different groups, and that is why it is considered by most intelligence experts to be more dangerous now than it was then,” Mr. King said.
Debating the issue
Peter Bergen, a national security analyst who has studied the terrorist network for 20 years, proposed that “al Qaeda has been defeated.” He made the assertion during an Oxford-syle debate staged Tuesday by the New America Foundation, a centrist Washington think tank.
Mr. Bergen, who has written several books about al Qaeda and bin Laden, said he feels “like a Sovietologist in 1989” after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the Soviet Union began to collapse. “That’s a good feeling,” he said.
Thomas Lynch, a retired Army colonel and scholar at the National Defense University, seconded Mr. Bergen, saying it is important not to underestimate the catastrophic impact the killing of bin Laden had on al Qaeda.
“Bin Laden, as a personality, was no less relevant to turning the ideology of Salafi jihadism into a globally threatening movement than Lenin was to [forging] Marxist Bolshevism” into a disciplined revolutionary party, said Mr. Lynch, who was a senior adviser to the U.S. military on al Qaeda.
“We’re not saying jihadist terror is over,” Mr. Bergen added. “What we’re saying is that al Qaeda as an organization is now incapable of its central strategic purpose — to carry out large-scale terrorist attacks in the United States.”
Mr. Joscelyn and a colleague from the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies opposed Mr. Bergen’s debate proposal, noting that five serious plots aimed at the U.S. homeland since 2009 have been linked to al Qaeda.
“And [attacking the U.S.] isn’t even what they’ve been focused on” during that time, Mr. Joscelyn said.
His colleague — Bill Roggio, managing editor of The Long War Journal and a foundation senior fellow — agreed.
“We think in terms of the next election. These guys think in terms of 50 to 100 years,” Mr. Roggio said. “This may be a low point in their operational tempo, but they are not defeated. They haven’t stopped planning operations.”
“The reason that al Qaeda and these other [jihadist] groups came to exist in the first place was the authoritarian regimes [in the Arab world]. It’s no accident that so many of the members of al Qaeda were from Saudi Arabia or Yemen or Egypt,” Mr. Bergen said.
Mr. Bergen heaped scorn on the idea that the group was getting a fillip from the turmoil.
“Obviously, [the Benghazi attack] was a terrible tragedy,” he told The Washington Times. But “if that’s the best [al Qaeda] can do after nearly two years of the Arab Spring, it doesn’t suggest a renaissance to me.”
Nonetheless, he noted that the “protests are good for extremists. Provocations like this video [tick] off ordinary Muslims and create anti-Western anger [extremists] can exploit.”
“Any time any of these groups have the space and time to train and plan, they are thinking about” how to attack Western, and especially U.S., targets, the official said.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Shaun Waterman is an award-winning reporter for The Washington Times, covering foreign affairs, defense and cybersecurity. He was a senior editor and correspondent for United Press International for nearly a decade, and has covered the Department of Homeland Security since 2003. His reporting on the Sept. 11 Commission and the tortuous process by which some of its recommendations finally became ...
- Senator's memo shows Iran links in Homeland Security's troubled immigration program
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- Dems back bill to fix problems in investor visa program
- Democrats proceed with Mayorkas vote despite pending investigation
- Game players don't think peace has a chance in Syria
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By David A. Clarke Jr.
Blame Washington's intelligence failure, not lack of police
- Bill Maher: God a 'psychotic mass murderer' who 'drowns babies'
- College group's diversity event canceled after excluding white people
- EDITORIAL: Lois Lerner's dilemma
- Authorities search homes of missing Malaysian plane's pilots
- Russia claims to have downed U.S. drone over Crimea region; Pentagon denies
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- Ukraine says Russian forces backed by helicopter gunships move outside Crimea
- LAMBRO: Obama kickstarts the 'minimum wage economy'
- EXCLUSIVE: FBI blocked in corruption probe involving Sens. Reid, Lee
- Muslim insurgents shoot then set on fire Buddhist teacher in Thailand
Chaos as Manhattan building explodes
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014