- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
Pakistanis divided on army offensive after Taliban attack
U.S. pushes for strike on militants in North Waziristan area
Question of the Day
ISLAMABAD — Despite widespread outrage over the Taliban shooting of a female teenage activist, Pakistani leaders and opinion makers are divided over whether the government should respond by targeting the militants’ last major sanctuary along the Afghan border.
The recent attack on 14-year-old Malala Yousufzai has given new momentum to the debate.
One side argues the government should harness anger over the shooting to build public support for a push into North Waziristan.
The other claims more fighting isn’t the answer and would trigger a violent backlash. They recommend peace negotiations and ending Pakistani support for the U.S. war in Afghanistan.
A Taliban gunman shot and critically wounded Malala on Oct. 9 as she was returning home from school in Pakistan’s northwest. The militant group targeted her because of her vocal support for girls’ education and criticism of the insurgents’ behavior when they took over the scenic Swat Valley where she lived several years ago.
Pakistan’s army chief strongly criticized the attack shortly after it occurred, raising expectations that the military might be laying the groundwork for an operation in North Waziristan.
The army conducted a concerted public relations campaign before it launched an offensive in Swat in 2009 by seizing on anger over a video showing a Taliban fighter flogging a woman who allegedly committed adultery.
“We refuse to bow before terror,” Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani said the day after Malala was attacked. “We will fight, regardless of the cost.”
A prominent Pakistani politician urged the military to take on the Taliban in North Waziristan while addressing tens of thousands of people rallying support for Malala in the southern city of Karachi on Sunday.
“Move ahead and crush the Taliban, and 180 million people will be standing behind you,” the head of the Muttahida Qaumi Movement, Altaf Hussain, told the crowd by telephone from London.
Pakistani Interior Minister Rehman Malik said last week that the government is considering a military operation in North Waziristan, although he backtracked a few days later.
The military has long recognized the threat posed by Pakistani Taliban militants holed up in North Waziristan, but has been reluctant to launch an offensive there for several reasons. The army has said its troops are stretched too thin by operations in other parts of the tribal region.
Islamabad also has faced the challenge of launching an operation in North Waziristan without looking like it was simply doing the bidding of the United States, which is extremely unpopular in the country.
Opponents of military action against the Taliban, mainly right-wing Islamists, realized that outrage over Malala’s shooting could provide the government with the cover needed to conduct a North Waziristan offensive without looking like a U.S. stooge.
They responded by publicly accusing the government of using the attack as a pretext to fulfilling U.S. demands.
“We condemn the attack on Malala, but this attack took place in Swat, and we fail to understand why the government issued statements about launching an operation in North Waziristan,” said Hafiz Hussain Ahmed, a senior leader in the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam party. “They wanted to play politics on this issue.”
Pakistani politician Imran Khan, a former cricket star, told Geo TV on Tuesday that “military action is not a solution.”
He and many on the right believe the driving force behind the insurgency is Pakistan’s unpopular alliance with the United States and that the proper path forward would be for Islamabad to end its support for the war in Afghanistan and conduct peace talks with the militants.
Critics point out that past peace deals with the Taliban have failed and that the militant group repeatedly has said it is fighting the Pakistani government both because of its ties to the U.S. and to establish Islamic law throughout the country.
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is 'torture'
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq