- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
Drone privacy scare: Feds don’t know who is responsible for oversight, GAO reveals
Question of the Day
Americans may be counting on the federal government to stop drones from invading their privacy, but Washington has yet to figure out exactly whose job that is.
In testimony to a House subcommittee last week, a top official at the Government Accountability Office said various federal departments and agencies still are sorting out who will take lead in overseeing drones.
"At best, we can say it's unknown at this point," said Gerald Dillingham, director of civil aviation issues at the GAO, told the House Science, Space and Technology Committee's subcommittee on oversight during a Friday hearing.
As the Obama administration prepares to integrate drones into U.S. airspace — expected to take place by the fall of 2015 — privacy advocates, lawmakers and others worry about the potential impact drones could have on Americans' Fourth Amendment rights. Smaller and much less noticeable than traditional aircraft, drones are better suited for surveillance by law enforcement. Critics fear drones' ability to fly undetected could be abused by authorities, media outlets or others.
While the Federal Aviation Administration has promised to look into privacy issues, the agency has acknowledged explicitly that it has no legal authority to act. The FAA also has its hands full already to ensure drones can fly safely alongside airplanes and helicopters.
To fill the void on protecting privacy, lawmakers at the local, state and federal levels have introduced measures to limit drones and what they can do. At least 11 states, including Virginia, are considering legislation that would restrict how police and other agencies could use the craft.
City governments also are taking action. Officials in Seattle, for example, recently forced the police department to abandon its plan to use drones.
Members of Congress have put forth at least a half-dozen bills to address the craft and personal privacy protection. But even as drone use explodes in both the government and private sectors, it's unclear which part of the federal government would be responsible for enforcing such laws.
"We have to at least figure out who the go-to person is in the administration so it doesn't fall through the cracks," said New York Rep. Daniel B. Maffei, the ranking Democrat on the oversight subcommittee.
Committee Chairman Rep. Paul C. Broun, Georgia Republican, said Americans understandably have fears about drones and what they will be allowed to do, and it's up to Congress to allay those concerns.
"The public is frightened," he said.
Meanwhile, the FAA announced last week that it is accepting applications from states, universities and other entities to host six test sites where drones will be put through rigorous testing in preparation for their integration into U.S. airspace.
More than 30 states, including Virginia and Maryland, have expressed interest in the program. Competition to host the sites is expected to be fierce, as the six locations not only will provide an economic boost but also will play an important role during a revolutionary period in aviation.
The program is vital to the FAA's plan to integrate drones into the national airspace by September 2015, but it appears the agency is flexible on that date, which was established by Congress in last year's FAA Modernization and Reform Act.
"We view that [date] as a beginning. ... We look at it as a rolling approach" to integration, said Karlin Toner, director of the agency's joint planning and development office, in testimony to the oversight subcommittee.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- White House says it's open to 45 of panel's proposed 46 NSA changes
- President gets budget win -- but only by staying out of negotiations
- 'There's something about moms:' White House enlists mothers to sell Obamacare
- White House hints Olympic envoys a shot at Putin over gay rights
- Under pressure, White House to unveil key surveillance report
Latest Blog Entries
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
- Calling prison term disparities unfair, Obama commutes sentences for 8 crack offenders
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow