- Dick’s Sporting Goods lays off 478 PGA golf pros
- Senators: Cease-fire must allow Israel to defend against rockets, tunnels
- Sierra Leone doctor fighting Ebola catches disease
- Iraq welcomes Russian fighter jets, helicopter gunships into ISIL fight
- John McCain laments: Obama’s ‘self-pity … is really kind of sad’
- GOP offer to fix VA gives $10 billion in emergency funds
- Paul Ryan offers to repair U.S. economic safety net with a single grant stream
- Kim Jong-un builds bond with Putin: $250M Russia-backed addition to key port opens
- Pope Francis meets Meriam Ibrahim, a Sudanese woman sentenced to death
- Detroit porch shooting trial: Suspect says he didn’t know gun was loaded
Bipartisan bill builds pressure to halt Iran nuclear program
Question of the Day
Despite the bitter divisions between Republicans and Democrats on almost all other fronts, two key House lawmakers announced a bipartisan bill Wednesday to boost sanctions on Iran, trying to prevent it from acquiring a nuclear weapon.
Rep. Edward R. Royce, the House Foreign Affairs Committee’s chairman, and Rep. Eliot L. Engel, the committee’s ranking Democrat, introduced the “Nuclear Iran Prevention Act,” seeking to deepen U.S. and European economic pressure on the Islamic Republic’s leadership.
The new bill comes just a day after the Obama administration opened the door to going the other direction, with U.S. officials joining representatives from China, France, Russia and Germany in offering to ease sanctions on Iran if the Islamic Republic agrees to curb certain aspects of its nuclear program.
Mr. Royce and Mr. Engel said they wanted to ramp up pressure on Iran. Their bill targets individuals who transfer to Iran certain technologies used to abuse human rights, those who engage in censorship and related activities against Iranian citizens, and corrupt officials who confiscate humanitarian goods.
The bill also would require the secretary of state to determine whether the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is a foreign terrorist organization.
But the core focus is the Iranian nuclear program. In addition to authorizing the White House to restrict significant commercial trade with Iran, it seeks to deny the Iranian regime hard currency by calling on the administration to work closely with European allies to work toward ceasing Euro-denominated transactions.
“We will continue to tighten the screws on Iran,” Mr. Engel said. “I hope this crisis can be resolved through diplomacy, but words cannot be a substitute for action, and the U.S. must keep all options on the table.”
According to a report by Reuters news agency, Western officials participating in multiparty talks with Iranian officials in Kazhakstan on Tuesday offered to ease an existing ban on trade in gold and other precious metals and relax the existing embargo on oil-related products from Iran.
In addition to economic sanctions targeting Iran’s defense, aerospace and shipping communities, the Obama administration has spent recent years attempting to grow a global embargo on Iranian crude oil.
Specific details of the new potential deal were not revealed, although Iranian and U.S. officials sounded an optimistic tune Wednesday.
The parties agreed to hold another round of meetings in Istanbul on March 18. Reuters reported that Iran’s foreign minister said he was “very confident” a deal could be reached.
Secretary of State John F. Kerry, however, suggested that the Obama administration’s existing policy toward the Islamic Republic remains firm.
He added that President Obama has “made clear his determination to implement his policy that Iran will not have a nuclear weapon.”
That being said, Mr. Kerry also appeared eager to stress the administration’s desire to avoid a military confrontation with Tehran. The secretary of state said he was committed to working with France and other powers “in order to lead through a diplomatic solution to lead Iran to comply with its international obligations.”
Iranian officials have consistently argued that their nuclear program is peaceful and not geared toward the development of a warhead.
The White House and most lawmakers in Washington have long dismissed the claim.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Guy Taylor is the National Security Team Leader at The Washington Times, overseeing the paper’s State Department, Pentagon and intelligence community coverage. He’s also a frequent guest on The McLaughlin Group and C-SPAN.
His series on political, economic and security developments in Mexico won a 2012 Virginia Press Association award.
Prior to rejoining The Times in 2011, his work was ...
- U.S. intelligence nearly certain pro-Russian separatists downed Malaysian Airlines flight
- Israel's ambassador praises Obama, slams Human Rights Watch report
- U.S. scrambles as violence escalates in Israel-Hamas conflict
- MH17: Fear of ground-to-air missile strike becomes nightmare reality in Ukraine
- U.S., China to participate in unprecedented joint ground force exercise
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Algerian plane diverted due to storms, second aircraft: 116 missing
- Obama's empty tough-talk: Gun prosecutions plummet on his watch
- House panel OKs resolution to sue president for Obamacare delays
- Conservative groups decry Democrats' 'war on women' tactic
- Obama says public not familiar enough with issues
- Evidence shows Russia firing artillery into Ukraine: Pentagon
- Astronaut shares 'saddest photo' from space: Bombs bursting over Israel, Gaza
- Doctor, 2 others shot at Pennsylvania hospital: reports
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq