- Boston-area tornado rips 100 homes: ‘Are we in Kansas?’
- Rush Limbaugh: ‘There is no journalism anymore’
- Scott Brown struggles for political traction in New Hampshire Senate race
- California’s Jerry Brown cites God, ‘religious call’ to embrace illegals
- Hamid Karzai’s cousin killed by suicide bomber at Eid al-Fitr party
- Obama thanks Muslims for ‘building the very fabric of our nation’
- Israel flattens home of top Hamas leader, takes out power plant
- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
LAMBRO: Leveraging taxes with sequestration
Doomsday scenarios attempt to put the squeeze on taxpayers
Question of the Day
President Obama was back on the campaign trail Tuesday, preaching doom and gloom over the approaching budget cuts that will likely take place in March.
If you tuned in late to this daily soap opera, the federal government will begin cutting $85 billion in across-the-board spending reductions on Friday. That’s $85 billion out of a monster budget that is fast approaching $4 trillion a year.
Certainly, $85 billion is still a lot of money, but one does not have to have a degree in advanced math to understand that it’s a relatively tiny share of the total budget. It isn’t at all hard to find $85 billion in savings in a government the size of ours. We waste much more than that each year through inefficiency, duplication, fraud, theft and mismanagement.
Let’s start with $150,000 for Oklahoma’s Lake Murray State Park Airport, which may have one landing and takeoff a week and often none at all.
Congress could put together a budget, using just the budget savings identified by its auditing arm — the Government Accountability Office — that far exceeds $85 billion.
The president could have called in the leaders of Congress the day after his second inauguration and given them a list of programs that cry out for cuts and ask that they put together their own bill totaling $85 billion in real spending reductions. That’s what Congress has done for more than two-and-a-quarter centuries — enacting budgets that for most of our history presidents have signed into law.
This president isn’t interested in finding solutions. He is interested in playing the politics of blame and exploiting issues to his own and, ultimately, his party’s, benefit.
There was Mr. Obama on Tuesday, jetting off on another costly campaign road show, pounding the Republicans for being the kind of cold, cruel and heartless people who will slash programs needed to defend our country and care for the old, the sick and the poor.
Lifting the art of fear-mongering to a whole new level in presidential demagoguery, he raises the specter of laid-off meat inspectors, fewer police officers, untended airport security and delayed cancer research to scare us into submission.
Political combat and playing to our fears instead of our hopes is what Mr. Mr. Obama does. That’s all he knows and that’s what he seems to enjoy doing. In his brief residency in the Senate, he wasn’t known for reaching across the aisle to get anything done. Quite the contrary, he was out on the political hustings, attacking Republicans with relish.
Yet his trip to Newport News, Va., to highlight the impact sequestration will have on its shipbuilding economy, will not alleviate our fiscal troubles one iota. It won’t create a single job or cut one dollar from a swollen, out-of-control, unsustainable budget.
“This is no time for a road show president,” House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy lectured Mr. Obama at a news conference Monday with other Republican leaders. “This is a time to look for someone who will lead and work with us, because we’re willing to work with them to solve America’s problems.”
The president could have just as easily climbed into his limo for a short drive up to Capitol Hill to suggest that in a government this size, that spends this much money, surely we can easily identify a piddling $85 billion in real budget cuts. I mean, this isn’t brain surgery.
Mr. Obama maintains the Republicans in the House are the obstacle to any solution to the present impasse. In fact, it is Mr. Obama’s unreasonable and stubborn insistence that any budget deal must come with tax increases.
He, his party and their pals in the news media say the Republicans in Congress are the ones holding up any attempt to avert the budget cuts in order to prevent further tax increases on the rich.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
Get Breaking Alerts
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- EPSTEIN: All IRS roads lead to the archivist
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- PRUDEN: When the hangman botches the job
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia's gay marriage ban
- KEENE: Thinking outside nanny-state box with Paul Ryan
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'