- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
Obama speeds up drawdown in Afghanistan, hedges on post-2014 force
President Obama said Friday Afghan forces would take the lead for security in the country by this spring — slightly ahead of schedule — but gave no clear indication how many U.S. troops would remain in the country beyond next year, following a summit meeting at the White House with Afghan President Hamid Karzai.
The two leaders say the Afghan forces are “exceeding initial expectations” and will be in the leading combat role in the country this spring, instead of this summer as originally planned.
Whether any residual U.S. forces will be left behind in Afghanistan, Mr. Obama told reporters after the meeting, will depend critically on whether there is an immunity agreement for American troops with the Afghan government, as is the case with U.S. military deployments around the world.
“It’s our hope we can reach an agreement this year,” Mr. Obama said, appearing in the East Room of the White House with Mr. Karzai at his side, but he added that troops cannot remain without Afghanistan agreeing to give U.S. forces immunity from prosecution.
“Nowhere do we have a troop presence without immunity for our troops,” Mr. Obama said. “… It will not be possible without immunity.”
Senior administration officials earlier this week said they were not ruling out the possibility that all U.S. troops could be out of Afghanistan by 2014.
“We wouldn’t rule out that option,” Ben Rhodes, Mr. Obama’s national security adviser, told reporters during a conference call. “We’re not guided by the goal of a certain number of U.S. troops in the country. We’re guided by the objectives that the president set — disrupt, dismantle, defeat al Qaeda.”
The U.S. now has 66,000 troops in Afghanistan. U.S. commanders have proposed keeping 6,000 to 15,000 U.S. troops after 2014 to continue to train Afghan security forces and hunt down terrorists, but the White House has generally favored lower troop levels than the generals have.
Mr. Karzai also declined to speculate on whether such an agreement would be reached or on the size of a contingency force he’d like to see left behind.
But he did not categorically rule out the prospect that a status-of-forces agreement offering U.S. troops immunity to stay could be worked out.
As Afghan forces take responsibility for the security of their country, Mr. Obama made clear that and coalition forces would move to a support role this spring.
“Starting this spring — our troops will have a different mission … training, advising and assisting Afghan forces,” he said. “It will be a historic moment and another step to Afghan sovereignty.”
The president said he and Mr. Karzai will continue to work towards a security agreement that will detail final troop levels beyond next year. Remaining U.S. troops will be focused on training and assisting Afghan forces, along with targeted terrorism missions against al Qaeda and its allies.
“It’s our hope we can reach an agreement this year,” Mr. Obama said.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Susan Crabtree is an award-winning investigative reporter with more than 15 years of reporting experience in Washington, D.C. Her reporting about bribery, corruption and conflict-of-interest issues on Capitol Hill has led to several FBI and ethics investigations, as well as consequences for members within their caucuses and at the ballot box. Susan can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- GOP senators want IG probe of Sebelius' 'Obamacare' fundraising
- Teaming up with Christie, Obama says Jersey shore 'back in business'
- No Moore: Obama flubs name of Oklahoma city devastated by tornado, calls it 'Monroe'
- Obama to Okla. tornado victims: 'We have got your back'
- Amid his own challenges, Obama calls on Navy grads to hold themselves accountable
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Rand Paul wins 2014 CPAC straw poll, Ted Cruz finishes a distant second
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- EDITORIAL: As jobs vanish, Obama wants more of same
- Stolen European passports on Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777
- Obama engages in Ukraine diplomacy from Fla. resort as Russia digs in
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- PRUDEN: Likening Putin to Hitler on Ukraine shows Hillary's shaky grasp of history
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- Russias Putin nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again