- Executive order: Obama ups green-energy mandate on feds to 20 percent
- GOP launches candidate training: How to talk to women
- N.Y.’s Rockefeller Center lights up, as Bloomberg flicks on 76-foot Christmas tree
- Northern Ireland turns to ‘Game of Thrones’ to draw in tourists
- Washington woman live-tweets husband’s horrific car death
- China City of America mulled for New York — with $65M tax dollars
- Yemen defense ministry rocked by suicide bomber, gunfire
- Hack attack: 2 million Facebook, Twitter passwords stolen
- Mystery deepens over radioactive cobalt-60 stolen in Mexico
- No mas: Principal bans Spanish language in intercom announcement
Ban on gay-to-straight therapy for children halted
A first-of-its-kind California law banning therapies to change children's sexual orientation has been blocked temporarily, but lawyers are preparing for a court battle that could come soon.
The proceedings are being watched closely by gay rights groups as they are encouraging lawmakers in other states to outlaw such gay-to-straight "conversion" therapies.
The new law, S.B. 1172, prohibits mental health professionals in California from providing "sexual-orientation change efforts" (SOCE), under any circumstances, to people younger than 18.
The law is needed to protect gay children from conversion-therapy "quackery," said authors of the law, including California state Sen. Ted Lieu.
Opponents of the law argue that it's possible for some people with same-sex attractions to reorient themselves to heterosexual attractions and that sexual-orientation change therapies can benefit children who are confused about their sexuality or suffered sexual abuse.
After the law was signed in September by California Gov. Jerry Brown, opponents filed separate federal lawsuits to stop it, citing First Amendment constitutional arguments.
In one lawsuit, two mental health professionals and a man who said he benefited from SOCE argued that S.B. 1172 would impede their efforts to offer SOCE and chilled their rights to free speech. U.S. District Judge William B. Shubb agreed and enjoined the law from being enforced -- but only on the three plaintiffs.
The second lawsuit was filed by mental health professional David Pickup and others, including two youths who are receiving change therapy. U.S. District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller heard their arguments but found no justification to block S.B. 1172 from going into effect Jan. 1.
The Pickup plaintiffs appealed, and on Dec. 21, three judges of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a preliminary injunction on S.B. 1172 pending its review.
"The minors we represent and their families are thrilled about the injunction," said Mathew D. Staver, founder and chairman of Liberty Counsel, which represents the Pickup plaintiffs.
On Wednesday, Liberty Counsel filed legal papers for the review; others are expected to follow suit by the end of January.
The appellate court has yet to schedule arguments on the case, a spokeswoman for California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris said this week. According to Equality California and the National Center for Lesbian Rights, the case is on a "fast track," with a ruling expected early in 2013.
In her defense of S.B. 1172, Ms. Harris said the state correctly outlawed SOCE for minors because "every mainstream professional mental health organization" has concluded that it is ineffective and unsafe.
SOCE is a "potentially dangerous relic from an era when homosexuality was pathologized and criminalized," Ms. Harris wrote. Today, the scientific and professional consensus says that "homosexuality is a normal expression of human sexuality, and not a disease, condition, or disorder in need of a 'cure.'"
She and other supporters of the law point to a lengthy 2009 report on SOCE by the American Psychological Association that found that SOCE had no scientific basis, could cause harm to some people, and should not be promoted.
The same APA report, however, conceded that "there are no scientifically rigorous studies of recent SOCE that would enable us to make a definitive statement about whether recent SOCE is safe or harmful, and for whom," Mr. Staver said in his brief to the appellate court. In fact, sexual-orientation issues in children "are virtually unexamined," he said, adding that there is no empirical evidence that SOCE harms minors.
The three-judge panel granting the emergency injunction did not elaborate on their reasoning. The panel included Judges Alfred T. Goodwin, Edward Leavy and Milan D. Smith Jr.
Meanwhile, Rep. Jackie Speier, California Democrat, has introduced a House resolution denouncing SOCE. New Jersey lawmakers have introduced a bill similar to S.B. 1172, and gay rights advocates say they expect to see more such bills introduced this year.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Cheryl Wetzstein covers family and social issues as a national reporter for The Washington Times. She has been a reporter for three decades, working in New York City and Washington, D.C. Since joining The Washington Times in 1985, she has been a features writer, environmental and consumer affairs reporter, and assistant business editor. Beginning in 1994, Mrs. Wetzstein worked exclusively ...
- Embryonic stem cell research falls out of favor as scientists go ethical
- With new HIV research, FDA may let gay men donate blood
- HHS report shows a decrease in blood supply but also a drop in demand
- Little change in practice for China's one-child family policy
- Gay-marriage momentum comes to a sudden halt after Illinois
Latest Blog Entries
- Pro-life, stem-cell bill signed into law by Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback
- N. Dakota lawmakers approve tough abortion bill
- Pope Benedict XVI's successor should allow priests to get a new title: Husband, poll finds
- House votes to reject Obama welfare shift
- Report: Two out of three Democrats support gay marriage
- CURL: 'Mission Accomplished' for Obamacare
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality
- Washington woman live-tweets husbands horrific car death
- Pentagon may give recruits 'a shot to start over' after shameful social media posts
- Democratic infighting erupts over 'we can have it all' fantasy on entitlements
- Obama returns to class warfare as poll numbers plunge
- Young millennials shun Obamacare, creating risky imbalance
- Hack attack: 2 million Facebook, Twitter passwords stolen
- HARPER: 'Knockout game' not a myth to liberal Sharpton
- Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
A libertarian look at breaking news and political trends by author Tom Mullen.
A stat-head’s outlook, direct from his worn in couch cushion.