- ‘I Am Alive’ app gains popularity in terror-ravaged Lebanon
- Gun giveaways gain popularity among Republican candidates
- S.C. hospital worker slapped with $525 federal fine for refilling $0.89 soda
- Teen from ‘Jihad Jane’ plot becomes youngest ever to serve time on U.S. terror charges
- Iranian woman forgives son’s killer at the gallows
- Nebraska principal sorry for ‘don’t tattle’ flier
- Illinois readies to spend $100M for Obama museum in Chicago
- John Edwards back in court — this time as a lawyer for Va. boy’s malpractice case
- Covered California reports more than 200K in overtime Obamacare sign-ups
- Thanks, Chuck: Hagel says U.S. sending Ukraine sleeping mats, helmets
N. Korean nuke test can’t fool global sensors
A nuclear test by North Korea will generate sound waves, seismic shock waves similar to an earthquake and, if the test site is not properly sealed, a spike in levels of radiation that will all be quickly detected by a global network of sensors, analysts say.
“If North Korea tests, it’s highly likely we’ll find it out. We have before,” said Mark Hibbs, a Berlin-based senior associate in the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’s Nuclear Policy Program.
“After sensors register what looks like a test, we can anticipate there will be some surveillance aircraft flying around the neighborhood and following weather patterns to try to pick up nuclides,” he added, referring to particles that would indicate an atomic explosion.
North Korea last week threatened to conduct a third nuclear test and launch more long-range rockets.
The belligerent rhetoric was in retaliation for a new U.N. resolution that reprimands Pyongyang for launching a rocket in December and imposes new sanctions.
North Korea has given no time line for carrying out a nuclear test.
“The most important clue will be a seismic-shock event like an earthquake that will be detected at many stations,” said Robert Kelley, the Vienna, Austria-based former director of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N.’s nuclear watchdog.
A very small test would be detected by several nearby stations, he said.
“If it is a larger test — like a ‘typical’ 10-kiloton bomb test that might be expected — the shock waves will be detected and measured by dozens of stations, which can triangulate right in on ground zero,” Mr. Kelley explained.
The United States and North Korea’s neighbors in Asia have “extensive seismic, infrasound, and radionuclide monitoring technologies that will detect any North Korean nuclear detonation,” said Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association.
“Underground nuclear-test explosions also emit small quantities of certain types of radioactive gases that can be detected by mobile air-monitoring equipment deployed by the U.S. Air Force, and, depending on weather patterns, by certain ground stations controlled by Russia, Japan and South Korea, as well as the international radionuclide monitoring stations operated by the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organization,” he added.
In October 2006, a relatively low-yield nuclear explosion by North Korea was easily detected by the International Monitoring System, a worldwide network of technology that helps verify compliance with the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty.
Telltale radioactive gases from this test were also detected at a monitoring station 4,600 miles away in Canada, said Mr. Kimball.
North Korea’s second nuclear test, in May 2009, was confirmed by seismic shock waves. However, no radiation was detected. Analysts attribute the absence of radiation to the likelihood that the explosion took place very deep underground.
Recent satellite photographs of the Punggye-ri nuclear test site in northeastern North Korea show that the site is in a state of readiness and that a test could be conducted within weeks of an order being given, according to an analysis by 38 North, a program of the School of Advanced International Studies’ U.S.-Korea Institute.
As North Korea appears set to test another nuclear device, the question remains: Does Pyongyang have enough highly enriched uranium to build a nuclear weapon? A third nuclear test could provide the answer.
“The answer to that question isn’t trivial,” said Mr. Hibbs.
Gary Milhollin, founder of the Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control, said North Korea “has had at least one enrichment plant running successfully for some time, and we have to assume that plant has made enough material for a test.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ashish Kumar Sen is a reporter covering foreign policy and international developments for The Washington Times.
Prior to joining The Times, Mr. Sen worked for publications in Asia and the Middle East. His work has appeared in a number of publications and online news sites including the British Broadcasting Corp., Asia Times Online and Outlook magazine.
- Amid clashes, White House nixes 'lethal' Ukraine aid
- U.S. rebukes Iran's U.N. envoy pick over 1979 embassy attack
- U.S. missing out on big opportunities in Africa, Liberian official says
- House follows Senate in passing bill to bar Iran's U.N. pick
- Obama admin unfairly pitting China against North Korea: diplomat
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
Team Obama's bizarre behavior helps Gitmo terrorists foil justice
- BOLTON: A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
- Obama taunts GOP, takes nationally televised victory lap on Obamacare
- Joe Biden's first Instagram pic mocked as shill for sunglass ad
- Jews being told to register in Ukraine: John Kerry
- Rand and Ron Paul ride to the rescue for Bundy in Nevada standoff with feds
- WEBER: Obamacare cuts home healthcare for millions of seniors
- IRS emails reveal discussion with Justice about suing nonprofits for election activities
- Cliven Bundy's Nevada ranch wrecked by retreating feds
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Brewer signs 1 of 4 pro-gun bills passed Wednesday
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.