- Keystone XL pipeline still on hold after State Dept. decision
- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
- ISTOOK: IRS “wants to throw us in jail,” says tea party leader
- Easter woes: Chocolate costs soar, becoming ‘unaffordable’ luxury
- Michaels craft chain confirms hackers hit 3M customers
- Special Forces’ suicide rates hit record levels — casualties of ‘hard combat’
State Dept. warns that all Afghan travel is unsafe
More than 11 years have passed since U.S. troops first entered Afghanistan, but remnants of the al Qaeda network "remain active" in the nation and no place in the country is safe for Americans, according to the latest "travel warning" issued by the State Department on Tuesday.
"The security situation remains volatile and unpredictable throughout the country," according to the travel warning, which arrives as U.S. military forces are preparing to withdraw significant forces from Afghanistan.
While U.S. troops are slated to turn the nation's security operations over to Afghan forces during the months ahead, the travel warning contends that "Afghan authorities have a limited ability to maintain order and ensure the security of Afghan citizens and foreign visitors."
"Travel in all areas of Afghanistan is unsafe due to military combat operations, landmines, banditry, armed rivalry between political and tribal groups, and the possibility of insurgent attacks," the warning states.
It was unclear Tuesday how closely the State Department coordinated on the warning with White House, where President Obama met earlier this month with Afghan President Hamid Karzai to discuss the impending drawdown of U.S. forces.
Mr. Obama said on Jan. 11 that Afghan forces were exceeding initial expectations and would be given the lead on security by this spring — slightly ahead of schedule. He did not say, however, how many U.S. troops would remain in the country beyond next year.
Mr. Obama said the question of whether any residual U.S. forces would remain in Afghanistan would depend on whether there is an immunity agreement for American troops with the Afghan government, as is the case with U.S. military deployments around the world.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Guy Taylor is the National Security Team Leader at The Washington Times, overseeing the paper’s State Department, Pentagon and intelligence community coverage. He’s also a frequent guest on The McLaughlin Group and C-SPAN.
His series on political, economic and security developments in Mexico won a 2012 Virginia Press Association award.
Prior to rejoining The Times in 2011, his work was ...
- Secret U.S. assessments show Afghanistan not ready to govern on own
- U.S. fears Afghan services may be cut as corruption sharply reduces customs taxes
- Rep. Jason Chaffetz questions $175 million USAID 'slush fund' for Afghans
- Amid growing unrest, GOP presses for arming Ukraine
- John McCain blasts John Kerry in heated Senate hearing
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
- Harry Reid blasts Bundy ranch supporters as 'domestic terrorists'
- Immigration still on hold: Boehner's office
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response
- Supreme Court weighs appeal to concealed-carry gun laws
- Nancy Pelosi washes immigrants' feet in humble Holy Week act then promotes on Twitter
- PRUDEN: When a bored president just 'mails it in'
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- BRUCE: Obama deliberately emboldening America's enemies
- Joe Biden's biggest gaffe: VP blowing his 2016 head start
- Jews being told to register in Ukraine: John Kerry
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.