- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
Workers prepare budgets because Congress won’t
Question of the Day
Civilian workers in the Defense Department are bracing themselves for layoffs and furloughs that could cost them a chunk of their paychecks with the automatic spending cuts set to begin March 1.
More than a dozen employees in the Civilian Expeditionary Workforce Program in Afghanistan who had been approved for extended tours of duty there now are being told to come home, a member of the program told The Washington Times.
“Now I’m hanging in the breeze because Congress couldn’t get its act together to pass a budget,” the program member said from Afghanistan.
In addition, the continuing resolution under which the Pentagon is operating — limiting spending to fiscal 2012 levels — has generated layoffs and profit losses among defense contractors, even as the automatic budget reductions called sequestration promise less funding for programs and personnel.
The management and technology consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., which supplies contract workers to the Defense Department, laid off 124 employees in January.
What’s more, Booz Allen’s third-quarter revenue for fiscal 2012 decreased to $1.39 billion from $1.44 billion the previous year, company officials said in a conference call Wednesday.
“We’re just now starting to see conversation around what costs would be reduced if we go into sequestration,” Sam Strickland, executive vice president and chief financial officer, said during the call.
“So we still haven’t yet been able to identify how much that would impact us, if at all. Now, you have to assume that if overall spending goes down, that it would have some impact on us. But, when we talk about our uncertainty, that’s certainly one of them,” Mr. Strickland said.
As many as 800,000 civilians employed by the Defense Department could be affected by sequestration.
Last week, Defense Deputy Secretary Ashton Carter said that as many as 46,000 temporary civilian workers could be laid off as early as mid-February.
On Jan. 10, Mr. Carter authorized each of the armed services to freeze civilian hiring, terminate temporary hires and notify contract employees that their contracts would not be renewed, except for those with mission-critical jobs.
Mission-critical jobs are those “essential for the preservation of life or property,” a Pentagon spokeswoman said.
“No more Starbucks, no more eating out, no more going out,” said one civilian Pentagon worker who asked not to be identified. “And thank goodness I don’t have kids — what about those with families?”
Full-time Pentagon civilians would not be subject to layoffs, but could face furloughs — unpaid time off — of up to 30 consecutive calendar days or of one day per week for 22 weeks.
Under sequestration, the Pentagon would need to cut $45 billion from its budget before Sept. 30, so the 22-day furloughs would need to begin no later than May, leaving workers with three months to plan for pay cuts.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Kristina Wong is a national security reporter for The Washington Times, covering defense, foreign policy and intelligence affairs. She can be reached at email@example.com.
- Despite Pentagon cuts and eye on Pacific, Air Force implored to save the 'Warthog'
- Pentagon welcomes budget deal but says more defense spending needed
- Rep. Hunter to Pentagon: Don't lower combat standards for women
- Scientists raise alarm over plan to destroy Syria's chemical weapons at sea
- Hagel renews Qatar defense pact despite differences over Iran, Syria
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is 'torture'
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq