- Iran mulls ban on vasectomies, decrease on abortions to bolster population
- CNN op-ed claims right-wingers ‘more deadly than jihadists’
- Classes resume at high school rocked by stabbings
- ABC News accuses Center for Public Integrity of stealing Pulitzer-winning work
- Law firm that cleared N.J. Gov. Christie in ‘Bridgegate’ gave 10K to RGA, which he heads
- PETA ‘hopping mad’ at Michelle Obama for using real eggs at Easter Egg Roll
- Sneaky Nebraska toddler traps self inside claw machine game
- Biden to lead $600 million work force training effort
- Atheists’ Easter taunt to Christians: ‘Jesus is a myth’
- Miley Cyrus hospitalized, cancels Kansas City show
Parents plea with FCC to keep TV’s decency rules
Thousands of people — often describing themselves as parents and grandparents — passionately urged the FCC not to change policy and allow “fleeting” or “isolated” instances of nudity and cursing on public airwaves.
More than 101,000 comments were filed just hours before the Wednesday evening deadline to the Federal Communications Commission on its possible policy change for programming airing before 10 p.m.
Just how much impact these comments will have on the agency’s final decision remains unclear.
“It is the voice of the American people,” said Tim Winter, president of the Parents Television Council, which tracks indecency in the media. “Is the public-comment period important? Or is the industry’s voice more important? We’ll see.”
The FCC is not compelled to do anything in its decency enforcement. Several of its enforcement decisions were thrown out in a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court ruling.
In April, the agency asked for comment on a proposal to penalize radio and television broadcast companies for egregious instances of obscenity, but not “isolated” ones. The change presumably would accommodate occasions where people curse during live broadcasts or when there is a “wardrobe malfunction,” as happened to singer Janet Jackson during the 2004 Super Bowl.
“Don’t allow trashier trash to be aired. Please,” wrote a Utah woman.
“Please set a higher [decency] standard. We have compromised far too much already,” said a woman from Fairfax.
Traditional-values groups also weighed in, asking the FCC to keep its current standard and penalize both isolated and egregious instances of obscenity.
Networks have pledged to act in the public interest and they “have a moral duty to the American public to responsibly provide content that is acceptable for all viewers,” said Concerned Women for America.
If obscenity is OK if it’s isolated, “my concern is that … every show in prime time will likely have some incident of profanity or indecency, like nudity. And the networks will be jumping over each other to top each other,” said Patrick Trueman, president and chief executive of Morality in Media. “The language they are proposing is ambiguous and ambivalent.
Ted Baehr, chairman of the Christian Film and Television Commission, said the proposed language is too ambiguous and “doesn’t help the situation at all.”
However, industry representatives said current decency rules are confused relics of a bygone era.
The National Association of Broadcasters did refer to the “regulatory vagueness,” but recommended the FCC clearly state that it “will no longer treat fleeting or isolated expletives and images as actionably indecent.”
Others see it as just a waiting game.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Cheryl Wetzstein covers family and social issues as a national reporter for The Washington Times. She has been a reporter for three decades, working in New York City and Washington, D.C. Since joining The Washington Times in 1985, she has been a features writer, environmental and consumer affairs reporter, and assistant business editor.
Beginning in 1994, Mrs. Wetzstein worked exclusively ...
- Judge voids N. Dakota's 'heartbeat' abortion law
- Family, agency in custody battle over sick daughter
- Values group wins court round over use of gay marriage photo
- Gay-photo lawsuit partially dismissed
- Some gay activists fear same-sex supporters are becoming intolerant
Latest Blog Entries
- Gay therapy ban author seeks Calif. House seat
- Transgender 'bathroom law' gets 5,000 more signatures
- Pro-life, stem-cell bill signed into law by Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback
- N. Dakota lawmakers approve tough abortion bill
- Pope Benedict XVI's successor should allow priests to get a new title: Husband, poll finds
TWT Video Picks
By returning to Christian roots, the nation can achieve greatness once again
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- GOP writes legislation to deny Attorney General Eric Holder his salary
- Secret U.S. assessments show Afghanistan not ready to govern on own
- Fuel-filled wings, ability to swarm: Pentagon offers glimpse at future of drone fleet
- CARSON: Recovering Tocqueville's vision of American exceptionalism
- Atheists rush to stage Easter display: 'Jesus Christ is a myth'
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Nevada Bundy ranch standoff could leave dirt on Harry Reid reputation
- EDITORIAL: Intolerance at Brandeis silences Muslim dissident Hirsi Ali
- Kirsten Dunst: Actress sparks feminist ire: 'You need a man to be a man'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.