- Sarah Palin to campaign for Senate candidate Ben Sasse in Nebraska
- Boise business entices customers to come break stuff — ‘recreational destruction’
- Fired Yahoo exec’s $60 million golden parachute may be a record
- Arkansas gynecologist snapped nude photos of patients, police say
- Anthony Weiner on his current sexting habits: ‘None of your business’
- Producers eye Capitol Hill for latest reality TV hit
- No selfie awareness: Obama, Biden mug for Instagram as Ukraine implodes
- Putin to Snowden: We don’t collect droves of data on everyone like the U.S.
- Clemson football’s new opponent: Atheists upset with player prayer, Bible study
- Toronto Mayor Rob Ford’s re-election launch party will be ‘history in the making,’ brother says
Appellate court’s decision to immediately permit gay marriages is challenged
While California county clerks process marriage applications for gay couples Sunday, attorneys for supporters of Proposition 8 are waiting for a response to the emergency appeal they filed Saturday evening with the U.S. Supreme Court, saying the rule of law has not been followed.
The legal team with Protectmarriage.com filed its application with Associate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who has jurisdiction over such motions for the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
The stay was supposed to “remain in place until final disposition by the Supreme Court,” said Austin R. Nimocks of Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF). But the appeals court “acted contrary to its own order, without explanation,” when it gave the OK for gay marriages on Friday.
“The integrity of our judicial system depends in no small part on the ability of litigants and the members of the public to rely on a judge’s word,” Mr. Nimocks added.
On Wednesday, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. released the high court’s 5-4 ruling in Hollingsworth v. Perry, which vacated the decision of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court. The reason for this was that the proponents of Proposition 8 did not have standing to appeal a decision in federal court, the majority opinion said.
Justice Kennedy wrote a dissenting opinion, arguing that if the proponents of a voter initiative — that circumvents state officials — cannot appeal on behalf of their law when state officials refuse to defend it, it undermines the initiative process.
In their ruling Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court invited the losing side to petition for a rehearing on the matter in 25 days.
Proposition 8 proponents believed they had 25 days to make their decisions on whether to seek a rehearing and/or take other legal steps to save the law.
However, in a press conference, California Attorney General Kamala Harris said she had advised the 9th Circuit Court that it did not have to wait 25 days to permit gay marriages to go forward. The appellate court agreed and gave the green light for marriages late Friday night.
Shortly thereafter, in San Francisco, Ms. Harris presided over the marriage of Kristin Perry and Sandy Stier, the lesbian plaintiffs in the Proposition 8 case. In Los Angeles, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa did the same for the male plaintiffs, Paul Katami and Jeff Zarrillo.
On Saturday, clerks’ offices opened to accommodate long lines of gay and lesbian couples seeking marriage licenses; many of those offices will be open Sunday, too.
In 2008, gay marriage was legal for almost 5 months in California, but this ended in November 2008, when voters passed Proposition 8 with 52 percent support. Prop 8 said that only marriages of one man and one woman were valid or recognized in California.
The two same-sex couples sued to overturn the law, and in 2010 U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker overturned Proposition 8 as unconstitutional. On appeal, a three-judge panel from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with Judge Walker and struck down the law as well.
After the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, lawyers with ADF and other conservative legal defense organizations said they still had legal options — especially since the Supreme Court didn’t strike down the law as unconstitutional.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Cheryl Wetzstein covers family and social issues as a national reporter for The Washington Times. She has been a reporter for three decades, working in New York City and Washington, D.C. Since joining The Washington Times in 1985, she has been a features writer, environmental and consumer affairs reporter, and assistant business editor.
Beginning in 1994, Mrs. Wetzstein worked exclusively ...
- Judge voids N. Dakota's 'heartbeat' abortion law
- Family, agency in custody battle over sick daughter
- Values group wins court round over use of gay marriage photo
- Gay-photo lawsuit partially dismissed
- Some gay activists fear same-sex supporters are becoming intolerant
Latest Blog Entries
- Gay therapy ban author seeks Calif. House seat
- Transgender 'bathroom law' gets 5,000 more signatures
- Pro-life, stem-cell bill signed into law by Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback
- N. Dakota lawmakers approve tough abortion bill
- Pope Benedict XVI's successor should allow priests to get a new title: Husband, poll finds
TWT Video Picks
By John R. Bolton
Reality calls for attaching Gaza to Egypt and the West Bank to Jordan
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- Removal of military gear limits options for U.S., NATO in Ukraine
- Joe Biden's first Instagram pic mocked as shill for sunglass ad
- BOLTON: A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
- Rand and Ron Paul ride to the rescue for Bundy in Nevada standoff with feds
- IRS emails reveal discussion with Justice about suing nonprofits for election activities
- CURL: The state of the Union worse than you thought
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Cliven Bundy's Nevada ranch wrecked by retreating feds
- CNN op-ed claims right-wingers 'more deadly than jihadists'
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.