- NYT’s David Brooks: Obama has ‘manhood problem’ in Middle East
- Ted Cruz thanks Obama for denying visas to terrorists
- Survivors recall chaos, fear in Everest avalanche
- General Mills apologizes for ‘right to sue’ confusion, reverses policy
- Dealer wanted in U.S. for art fraud nabbed in Spain
- Easter morning delivery for space station
- Boxer Rubin ‘Hurricane’ Carter dies at 76
- Probe could complicate Rick Perry’s prospects
- Ukraine, Russia trade blame for eastern shootout
- Obamas head to church on Easter morning
LOVERRO: Like it or not, Mike Shanahan should remain with Redskins
Now he is coaching to see if he will be here not just for years to come, but for next year as well, in the minds of a number of Redskins fans who are sick and tired of losing, save for the occasional season of illusionary success, for more than 20 years now.
He is in the fourth year of the five-year contract he signed with Redskins owner Daniel Snyder, and unless he responds like his team did last year — a seven-game run to win the NFC East title — some fans would just as soon not see him on the sidelines for a fifth season.
It’s an understandable reaction — four years and a 24-33 record. Shanahan is paying the price for the dysfunctional years of the Vinny Cerrato reign — not just with his team, but with the fan base as well.
But if you call for the firing of Shanahan after this year, then you are no better than the owner who angered you for years with his meddling and influence. We all know that Shanahan told Snyder he would need five years to dig this franchise out of the grave the owner had dug for it.
You have to give Shanahan that fifth season. You have to see the end of this movie.
In order to do that, you have to give him a contract extension.
It doesn’t have to be a long-term marriage — a one-year extension would suffice, though there is no guarantee that Shanahan would agree to a deal that is clearly a hot-seat arrangement.
The coach told reporters Wednesday that he’s not worried about his future.
“I’ve got a contract for next year,” Shanahan said. “I’ve got a contract this year. I’m concerned about our games. I’ve been very lucky. I’ve been in this profession for a long time and your focus is on your job. And I say that with all due sincerity — it’s something I do not think about.”
I love when Shanahan issues qualifiers such as “with all due sincerity,” as if it is different from everything else he says.
“Any time I talk about a contract, if it’s with a player or coach, it’s always after the season,” he said. “Once we get started we don’t talk about it because we’ve got to focus on each game, and if you don’t focus on the game you take away from what you’re trying to accomplish.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- LOVERRO: Bryce Harper-Mike Trout comparisons may be a career-long thing
- LOVERRO: On the Wizards' trip to Brazil, a miracle happened
- LOVERRO: Capitals' major challenge is finding someone who can win with Alex Ovechkin
- LOVERRO: Bo Belinsky, Sonny Liston share a cemetery - one found peace, the other didn't
- LOVERRO: Injured hand didn't keep Scott Christopher from a life of baseball and art
Latest Blog Entries
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- EXCLUSIVE: FBI blocked in corruption probe involving Sens. Reid, Lee
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- USAID documents cite Hillary Clinton in chaos of Afghan aid
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Yelp.com's ethics questioned
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.