- GOP hopes taking shutdown off the table with budget deal will pay dividends
- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
Cities in Colo. to vote on fracking moratorium
Ballot issues cite environmental, health concerns
FORT COLLINS, Colo. — It’s been a tough year for the oil-and-gas industry in Colorado: First its operations were clobbered in last month’s historic floods, and now they’re fighting four anti-fracking measures on local ballots.
Voters in the cities of Boulder, Broomfield and Fort Collins are considering ballot questions to restrict hydraulic fracturing within their boundaries by enacting a five-year moratorium, part of a growing movement by localities in states across the country to restrict or end the booming natural gas drilling technique that is revolutionizing global energy markets.
Groups in Ohio and Michigan are gearing up already to try to get similar anti-fracking measures before voters in 2014.
Voters in Lafayette, Colo. are weighing Question 300, called the Community Rights Act, which would prohibit any new oil or gas extraction while nixing corporate “personhood.”
The initiatives represent the latest blast at the industry in fuel-rich Colorado, where about 50,000 wells dot the Front Range as part of the Denver-Julesburg basin. With the boom has come jobs and prosperity, but also friction as wells bump up against suburban neighborhoods.
Anti-fracking activists argue that the measures are needed to protect public health and the environment, given the pro-development bent of Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper and the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. According to campaign finance reports, the association has ponied up more than $600,000 too fight the four initiatives, including $256,134 to groups opposing the measure in Fort Collins alone.
“[W]e’re endorsing Question 300 on principle, the principle that a community should have the right to exert local control when it comes to keeping corporations and misguided governors from compromising public health and safety,” said a Thursday editorial in the liberal Boulder Weekly.
Meanwhile, industry officials took a more visible stance against the measures last week at the Natural Gas Symposium, sponsored by Colorado State University. The suggestion that voters must choose between jobs and health is a “false choice,” said Noble Energy CEO Chuck Davidson.
“There’s a lot of facts there that show we can have both,” said Mr. Davidson. “This is not a choice between clean water, clean air, and having energy and jobs, this is truly both. Just shutting something down is not the answer to how America works.”
An editorial in the Denver Post urged voters last week to reject the proposed fracking bans, pointing out that “the purpose of this moratorium is to stop new drilling — which courts have not allowed.”
Any proposal that passes is likely to end up in court. Voters in Longmont passed a fracking ban last year, which was promptly hit with a lawsuit filed by the state.
If the anti-fracking measures pass, officials say it’s going to be difficult for companies like Noble to continue investing in Colorado.
“That’s saying more than ‘no’ to hydraulic fracturing—in America, that’s really saying ‘no’ to oil and gas development,” said Mr. Davidson.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Valerie Richardson covers politics and the West from Denver. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- DIVEST! Oil is the new apartheid on college campuses
- Californians encouraged to get the Christmas gift that gives all year long: Obamacare
- Colorado judge: Bakery owner discriminated against gay couple
- Fast-food protests spur backlash
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality
Latest Blog Entries
By Mangosuthu Buthelezi
Memories of a long brotherhood tempered in common struggle
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- House votes for bargain to end budget drama
- Jane Fonda Foundation fails to make single contribution in 5 years: report
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- Atheists smug as Hindus join Satanists to demand display at Oklahoma Statehouse
- American bourbon now better than Scottish whisky: U.K.-born expert
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Consummate traveler Todd DeFeo explores the unique stories that make destinations worth going to.
Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow