- George W. Bush to embattled Alabama kicker: You will be stronger
- Megachurch pastor with ties to Obama commits suicide
- WaPo to readers: Send us your ‘gun violence’ stories for Sandy Hook anniversary
- U.S. threatens Ukraine with sanctions over dispatch of riot police
- Canada doing away with door-to-door mail delivery by 2018
- NSA chief defends phone spying: ‘There is no other way’
- Hawaii Health Department head killed in plane crash
- Colorado school drops sexual harassment label on boy who kissed girl’s hand
- Australia court strikes down 5-day-old, gay-marriage law
- Fake interpreter at Mandela service: ‘Sorry,’ I have schizophrenia
Hyde abortion restrictions targeted
Pro-choice groups want ban on Medicaid funding lifted
Question of the Day
The Hyde amendment marks its 37th anniversary Monday, and pro-choice groups and their allies are determined to see it repealed before it hits its 40th.
The measure — named for the late Rep. Henry Hyde, Illinois Republican — prohibits federal dollars from subsidizing most abortions in the Medicaid program for poor women.
“Thirty-seven years is long enough,” said Kate Stewart, a communications official with Advocates for Youth, one of 20 feminist and pro-choice groups backing a campaign against the Hyde amendment called All Above All.
Health insurance reform is expanding Medicaid, and by extension, the Hyde amendment, she said. Ending Hyde “is a stand we all feel we need to take We’ve decided, once and for all, to be on the bus instead of thrown underneath it.”
Meanwhile, the leader of a pro-life group issued a report this week that projects that — despite the Hyde amendment — the new health insurance law could result in another 71,000 to 111,500 abortions performed each year with government funds.
“Social conservatives are rightly alarmed about the impact of Obamacare on abortion subsidies and reimbursement,” Charles A. Donovan, president of the Charlotte Lozier Institute and author of the new report, said on National Review Online.
Some 27 states and the District do not currently exclude elective abortion from their health exchanges, he noted in his new report. This means that in many states, “Americans will be complicit in the deaths of thousands of unborn children each year through their tax dollars,” he said.
The Charlotte Lozier Institute is the education and research arm of the Susan B. Anthony List.
Government funding of abortion has been hotly debated since the Supreme Court legalized abortion in its 1973 Roe v. Wade decision.
After several years of arguing, Congress enacted the Hyde amendment on Sept. 30, 1976, to prohibit federal funds from paying for abortions except in cases where the mother’s life was in danger. Exceptions for rape or incest were added later.
As an amendment, though, the Hyde restriction is not a permanent law, but has to be affirmatively added to the annual appropriations bill of the Department of Health and Human Services — a feat that has happened every year since it was established.
Research now shows that poor women often struggle to pay for an abortion — which costs an average of $470 in the first trimester, said Jessica Gonzalez-Rojas, executive director of National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health. “Last year we received over 100,000 calls for help” to pay for abortions, said Stephanie Poggi, executive director of the National Network of Abortion Funds.
Because poor women take longer to scrape together money for abortion, they often need later-term abortions which are both expensive and more dangerous, “a vicious cycle,” said Heather Boonstra, senior public policy associate at Guttmacher Institute.
Getting rid of the Hyde amendment is going to be “a multiyear effort,” but the new coalition should play a role in it, and “push us forward to a new day on this issue,” said Ms. Poggi.
Separately, on Wednesday night, another All Above All coalition member, the Center for Reproductive Rights, held a coast-to-coast Web event to promote its “Draw the Line” campaign.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Cheryl Wetzstein covers family and social issues as a national reporter for The Washington Times. She has been a reporter for three decades, working in New York City and Washington, D.C. Since joining The Washington Times in 1985, she has been a features writer, environmental and consumer affairs reporter, and assistant business editor.
Beginning in 1994, Mrs. Wetzstein worked exclusively ...
- Study IDs reasons for late-term abortions
- Panel seeks 'surveillance' system for gay blood donors
- Pregnancies decline overall, up among older women
- Embryonic stem cell research falls out of favor as scientists go ethical
- With new HIV research, FDA may let gay men donate blood
Latest Blog Entries
- Pro-life, stem-cell bill signed into law by Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback
- N. Dakota lawmakers approve tough abortion bill
- Pope Benedict XVI's successor should allow priests to get a new title: Husband, poll finds
- House votes to reject Obama welfare shift
- Report: Two out of three Democrats support gay marriage
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- Washington Post to readers: Send us your gun violence stories for Sandy Hook anniversary
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- MALCOLM/REIMER: Over-criminalization undermines respect for legal system
- Study IDs reasons for late-term abortions
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- Rand Paul: Budget deal 'shameful,' 'huge mistake'
- Colorado school drops sexual harassment label on boy who kissed girl's hand
- Teen thugs in D.C. run wild -- even while wearing GPS ankle bracelets
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
All of the world’s problems, solved on your back porch
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow