- NYT’s David Brooks: Obama has ‘manhood problem’ in Middle East
- Ted Cruz thanks Obama for denying visas to terrorists
- Survivors recall chaos, fear in Everest avalanche
- General Mills apologizes for ‘right to sue’ confusion, reverses policy
- Dealer wanted in U.S. for art fraud nabbed in Spain
- Easter morning delivery for space station
- Boxer Rubin ‘Hurricane’ Carter dies at 76
- Probe could complicate Rick Perry’s prospects
- Ukraine, Russia trade blame for eastern shootout
- Obamas head to church on Easter morning
Obama: ‘I was elected to end wars, not start them’
While saying he sympathizes with current public distaste for more war, President Obama on Friday made the case that the U.S. must live up to its global responsibilities, and for the first time raised the possibility that additional military action — beyond what’s on the table now — may be necessary if Syrian President Bashar Assad uses chemical weapons again.
Mr. Obama made the comments at a press conference in Saint Petersburg, Russia, just hours before he departs the G-20 Summit and returns to Washington without achieving the international consensus on Syria that he’d hoped.
In blunt terms, the president also cast himself as a man who seeks peace but has been thrust into the position of involving the U.S. into another Middle East conflict.
Not doing so, he said, would carry grave consequences not just for America, but for the entire world.
“I was elected to end wars, not start them,” he said. “I spent the last four-and-a-half years doing everything I can to reduce our reliance on military power as a means of meeting our international obligations and protecting the American people. But what I also know is that there are times when we have to make hard choice if we’re going to stand up for the things we care about. I believe this is one of those times.”
Mr. Obama spent much of the G-20 gathering of industrial and leading developing nations trying to rally support for action in Syria, but efforts to build a grand international coalition have failed. Any action by the United Nations surely will be blocked by Russia, and while Mr. Obama said he and Russian President Vladimir Putin took part in a private “full airing of views” on Syria, the two men still are far apart on how the global community should proceed.
Meanwhile, the White House continues to stress that any action against the Assad government would be “limited,” both in time and scope.
But for the first time, Mr. Obama on Friday spoke of how the U.S. would further involve itself in the Syrian conflict if Mr. Assad deploys chemical weapons again.
“I think, at that point, mobilizing the international community would be easier, not harder,” Mr. Obama said. “I think it would be pretty hard for the United Nations Security Council to resist the requirement for action, and we would gladly join with an international coalition to make sure it stops.”
Mr. Obama will address the nation on Tuesday from the White House, a last-ditch attempt to convince lawmakers and the American people that action is necessary. Both the House and Senate are expected to vote next week on resolutions authorizing military force against the Assad regime.
He conceded that efforts to pass those measures will continue to be a “heavy lift,” adding that he expects significant resistance from within his own party and among his supporters because they “remember that I opposed the war in Iraq.”
While in Saint Petersburg, however, the president focused most of his comments on the U.S. role in the world — a role that the nation may not always enjoy, he said, but one that Americans must accept.
“If we’re just issuing another statement of condemnation, if we’re passing resolutions saying, ‘Wasn’t that terrible?’, if people who decry international inaction in Rwanda and say how terrible it is that there are these human rights violations around the world, and why aren’t we doing something about it — they always look to the United States,” Mr. Obama said.
The president also disputed recent reports that he’s ordered military leaders to expand the list of Syrian targets, calling that claim “inaccurate” but declining to further discuss the “operational issues” of a potential American strike.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- What will a grandchild mean for Hillary?
- What will a grandchild mean for Hillary Clinton?
- Obama to tour site of Washington mudslide
- Obamas head to church on Easter morning
- Joe Biden's biggest gaffe: VP blowing his 2016 head start
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- In Colorado, a marijuana holiday tries to go mainstream
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- USAID documents cite Hillary Clinton in chaos of Afghan aid
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- CURL: Shelly O first lady Michelle Obama comes in last
- UNICEF launches 'Mr. Poo' mascot in India to curb public defecation
- See the scathing documents detailing $600 billion squandered in Afghanistan
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.