TRACCI: Subverting immigration laws in the name of reform

Legal authority for naturalization belongs to Congress, not the president

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

If the Obama administration is serious about working with Congress to reform America’s immigration system, it has a strange way of showing it.

Last April, Eric H. Holder, leader of America’s premier federal law enforcement agency and the only sitting Cabinet member ever to be held in contempt of Congress, declared: “Creating a pathway to earned citizenship for the 11 million unauthorized immigrants in this country is absolutely essential. This is a matter of civil and human rights.”

In January, Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson concluded that awarding U.S. citizenship to illegal immigrants is “frankly, in my judgment, a matter of who we are as Americans.”

Labor Secretary Thomas Perez’s public career has been marked by efforts to dismantle immigration-enforcement measures. Last month, Vice President Joe Biden declared: “You know, 11 million people that [sic] are living in the shadows. I believe they’re already American citizens.” Perpetual presidential candidate Hillary Clinton recently praised as “incredibly brave” a self-professed illegal immigrant who said it is “extremely difficult to empower myself to get a job, to vote.”

Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 of the Constitution gives Congress exclusive authority to provide a “uniform rule of naturalization.” The immigration laws lay out the blueprint by which noncitizens may become Americans. As the Supreme Court has recognized, “Drawing upon this power and upon the inherent power of a sovereign to close its borders, Congress has developed a complex scheme governing admission to our Nation and status within our borders.”

No less a liberal icon than now-deceased Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote for a majority court: “[a]t the least, those who elect to enter our territory by stealth and in violation of our law should be prepared to bear the consequences, including, but not limited to, deportation.”

Americans understand that the high honor of U.S. citizenship is earned, not commandeered. Polls reflect bipartisan recognition that immigrants who willfully violate America’s laws are entitled to compassion, not citizenship. Yet the Obama administration has embraced the view that the immigration laws are more hortatory than mandatory.

“Prosecutorial discretion” has evolved into “statutory nullification.” Executive officials publicly delegitimize immigration statutes they are bound to enforce. The administration now threatens additional “executive action” if Congress does not ratify its effort to subvert the law.

The administration’s conduct has broad consequences. It diminishes the significance of American citizenship. It abets general disrespect for the law. It demeans the service of federal law enforcement officers who risk — and have sacrificed — their lives to uphold the law. It punishes legal immigrants who play by the rules.

It sends a message to millions who seek lawful entry that the surest way to become an American is to violate our laws. It gives unlawful immigrants false hope that citizenship issues from executive decree. It defeats chances of legislative action by undermining the confidence of Congress. Perhaps this is the goal.

The House Republican leadership is currently weighing whether this administration “can be trusted” with immigration reform. But many properly wonder how this administration could be trusted when the attorney general, secretary of homeland security and vice president have determined that illegal immigrants are already entitled to U.S. citizenship.

How can Congress work with this administration to establish a “path to citizenship” if those charged with enforcing the law insist that illegal immigrants should be treated as if they are “already American citizens”? Given this track record, why would Congress expect the administration to change its approach to immigration enforcement after possible enactment of reform legislation? Even the House GOP leadership is not so naive.

It is clear that our immigration system must be overhauled. Labor participation rates remain at historic lows. Working- and middle-class wages are stagnant. The educational system is failing to produce the highly skilled workers needed to maintain U.S. economic competitiveness.

If the administration is genuinely interested in a legislative solution, viable reform legislation must be preceded by verifiable enforcement of existing immigration laws and unequivocal executive affirmation of their validity.

Congress should accept no less. This is not “too hard” for House Speaker John A. Boehner and other prominent Republicans. It is called “leadership.”

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts