What with all its social media and excruciatingly current references, the whole world appears to know the White House is hip, and very skilled at being hip. Does this mean the Grand Old Party should up its pop culture factor as two big elections approach, and proverbial “big tent” thinking beckons? Oh, but it’s complicated, particularly as conservatives pine for common-sense standard-bearers and the political landscape becomes more trivialized. It would be folly to compromise a reliable Republican brand in the search for more diverse voter interest. Or is it worth the risk? The competition is out there.
He was a former senior adviser to George W. Bush and the author of “What Jefferson Read, Ike Watched, and Obama Tweeted: 200 Years of Popular Culture in the White House”, published by Regnery Books in September. Mr. Troy points out that Mr. Obama’s reference to “Mad Men” during his State of the Union speech was the most tweeted moment of the entire event.
“The Democrats have some natural advantages in pop culture, but not every Democratic candidate in the future will be as savvy as Obama. That said, the GOP does need to put up more of an effort on the pop culture front in the future,” Mr. Troy concludes.
Complicated, but doable? Perhaps. The Republican Party may have to consult the Ronald Reagan playbook on this recommendation. The Gipper appeared hip in the sense that he was of good cheer, canny and young at heart, minus annoying attitude. He balanced show biz acumen with authentic political and diplomatic prowess and underlying inner mettle. But enough fancy jabber. The answer, then, is this: Yes, Republicans can be hip, or get hip or get hipper — as long as style doesn’t overwhelm substance, values and principles, or become a substitution for same. Then GOP would simply translate to Great Opportunity Plundered.
“I try to focus not on the fumbles but on the next play.”
— President Obama to Fox News host Bill O’Reilly in an interview airing on the network prior to the Super Bowl on Sunday.
SO YOU HAD A BAD DAY
“Bridgegate” is almost five months old. The constantly evolving melodrama that erupted following a three-day lane closure on the George Washington Bridge in September has cornered New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and threatened his image and the prospects of a 2016 presidential run. Amid accusations, denials and hardball countermeasures, there are two distinct branches of the story. One is legal, the other is political. Contrary to the hopes of press, pundits and the Democratic Party, there are no instant conclusions.
The legal outcome, which involves a U.S. attorney investigation of what Mr. Christie knew and when he knew it, is going to take a while. His political trajectory, meanwhile, is subject to interpretation — also with no instant conclusions.
“Chris Christie dead in the water,” proclaimed the Boston Herald, positing the idea that this was good news for such potential White House rivals as Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, Jeb Bush and even Mitt Romney. Multiple reports dwelled on Mr. Christie’s intensified offensive against charges that he knew about the disruption. A few spare GOP allies like Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin and Rudy Giuliani defended the governor on CNN, CBS and ABC, respectively, during Sunday talk show appearances. The press narrative, however, offered a negative premature prognosis.
“Is the news media jumping the gun on Gov. Chris Christie?” asks Fox News host Greta Van Susteren. Others wonder as well.
“What is it, exactly, that Christie is accused of? Creating a traffic jam? No, not quite. Ordering a traffic jam? No, that’s not quite right either. Being irritated with the mayor of Fort Lee, who declined to endorse his re-election bid, and wishing to get back at him somehow and then not minding when he was embarrassed with some really bad traffic over the George Washington Bridge?” asks Roger Kimball, a PJ Media columnist.
“That last comes pretty close to what the governor of New Jersey is accused of. Pretty heinous, eh? I mean, you never see bad traffic on the George Washington Bridge. And of course, no politicians ever indulge in political payback,” he adds.