- Unbeliebable: White House turns Bieber petition response into immigration screed
- Obama signs law denying Iran ambassador’s visa, but says law is ‘advisory’
- Mich. judge to laughing convicted killer: ‘I hope you die in prison’
- Man charged in Kansas City-area highway shootings
- Keystone XL pipeline still on hold after State Dept. decision
- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
SIMMONS: Norton’s school-choice concerns driven by politics, not reality
There’s a tug of war taking place in the nation’s capital, and school-choice advocates should push forward with all deliberate speed.
On the surface, the tug appears to be over money. That is to say, if D.C. leaders pass legislation Tuesday to help college students pay for school, then they risk losing federal tuition money.
At least that is how Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District’s nonvoting congressional delegate, interprets the pending measure.
A maker and reputable interpreter of laws, Ms. Norton, a Democrat, has been on the wrong side of school choice before, however.
In fact, I think she’s using the wrong stick to even gauge whether funding will be gained or lost if the bill she’s concerned about wins D.C. Council approval.
Titled the D.C. Promise Establishment Act of 2013, the measure calls for using income-based guideposts to help D.C. graduates pay for post-secondary technical schooling and college.
Council member David A. Catania’s bill could work in tandem with the D.C. Tuition Assistance Grant, or D.C. TAG, which Congress created in 1999 to offer students with few higher-education options in the city the difference between in-state and out-of-state tuition at public colleges and universities. A major difference is that the D.C. Promise eligibility ceiling is $283,272.
There are other key differences.
As Mr. Catania points out, “individuals from families with up to $1 million in annual income can participate in D.C. TAG, as well as students who graduated from high schools outside the District. Moreover, D.C. TAG assistance is primarily directed at public, four-year institutions, whereas the D.C. Promise can be used at all accredited institutions of higher education, as well as accredited career programs.”
That Mrs. Norton and other federal appropriators think D.C. Promise and D.C. TAG are competitors is interesting, considering the former targets poor D.C. kids who matriculated D.C. schools while the latter does not. Indeed, D.C. TAG encourages D.C. kids, including wealthy ones, to attend schools outside the District.
Ms. Norton said recently that House and Senate appropriators do not want the federal government to pay D.C. TAG if it and D.C. Promise have “similar funding levels.”
Fortunately, in a letter, Mr. Catania and Council Chairman Phil Mendelson tried to allay Ms. Norton’s concerns about the potential of competing financial aid programs in a letter last week.
See, while the supporters of D.C. TAG and D.C. Promise don’t say so, both programs are, for all practical and applicable matters, school voucher programs.
Both programs use public funds to bridge a financial gap — whether it’s to a public college or a private school — just like the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program, which was created by Congress to lift the boats of poverty-stricken kids.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Award-winning opinion writer Deborah Simmons is a senior correspondent who reports on City Hall and writes about education, culture, sports and family-related topics. Mrs. Simmons has worked at several newspapers, and since joining The Washington Times in 1985, has served as editorial-page editor and features editor and on the metro desk. She has taught copy editing at the University of ...
- SIMMONS: In D.C. budget battle, another who's-in-charge decision awaits
- SIMMONS: Food police are leaving your school kids unfed
- SIMMONS: Disinterest among voters hard for Republicans, independents to weather
- SIMMONS: Put adults in hot seat for system's failure, for Relisha's sake
- SIMMONS: City can't bear leaders' silence in missing girl case
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- EDITORIAL: Mark Warner running scared?
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- EDITORIAL: More Lerner smoking-gun emails at IRS
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Harry Reid blasts Bundy ranch supporters as 'domestic terrorists'
- 'Deport Bieber' petition draws no comment from White House
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.