- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Sen. Tom Coburn vows to slow down budget-busting bills ahead of recess
- Obama fantasizes about more executive power, signs new order on federal contractors
- Clintons call Klein, Halper, Kessler ‘a Hat Trick of despicable actors’: report
- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
- Pro-marijuana group claims responsibility for Brooklyn Bridge flag swap
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- Stabbing attack on transgender girl, 15, was ‘bias motivated,’ police say
- LGBT adults still lean overwhelmingly toward Democratic Party
- Lawmakers rattled by Syria genocide horrors, call on Obama to act
Federal judge backs Obamacare subsidies in win for administration
Dismisses challenge to Affordable Care Act’s tax credits
Question of the Day
A federal judge ruled Wednesday that the administration can pay subsidies to all deserving Obamacare enrollees, no matter who runs the exchanges they enrolled in — delivering a significant win to President Obama and preventing opponents from poking a major hole in his signature law.
U.S. District Court Judge Paul L. Friedman, presiding in Washington, dismissed a challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s tax credits, saying that the law doesn’t distinguish between states that are running their own health markets and states that ceded that responsibility to the federal government.
The ruling means millions of Americans can still collect taxpayer subsidies to help them buy insurance — a key element to making the new law work.
“In sum, the court finds that the plain text of the statute, the statutory structure, and the statutory purpose make clear that Congress intended to make premium tax credits available on both state-run and federally-facilitated exchanges,” Judge Friedman wrote in his opinion. “What little relevant legislative history exists further supports this conclusion and certainly — despite plaintiffs’ best efforts to suggest otherwise — it does not undermine it.”
An attorney for plaintiffs in the case, Halbig v. Sebelius, immediately notified the court they will appeal his decision.
“The court’s ruling today delivers a major blow to the states that chose not to participate in the Obamacare insurance exchange program,” said Sam Kazman, general counsel for the Competitive Enterprise Institute, which coordinated the lawsuit. “It is also a blow to the small businesses, employees and individuals who live in those states as well. In upholding this IRS regulation that is contrary to the law enacted by Congress, this decision guts the choice made by a majority of the states to stay out of the exchange program.”
The exchanges, launched in October, are a crucial piece of President Obama’s reforms that allow people on the individual market to compare plans and qualify for income-based subsidies to defray the costs of coverage. Thirty-four states decided to let the federal government run their health exchanges, while 16 states and the District of Columbia decided to operate their markets on their own.
The health law says the subsidies are available to those who sign up in exchanges “established by the state.” The plaintiffs — several businesses and individuals — said that should exclude those who sign up on the federal exchange, which covers all the states that refused to create their own exchanges.
The administration said it made no sense for Congress to exclude those in the federal exchange. But the plaintiffs argued the law’s authors wanted to use the subsidies as bait to get states to take responsibility for their respective exchanges.
Timothy Jost, a health policy expert at Washington and Lee University School of Law, said the plaintiffs’ argument “made no sense from the beginning.”
“Congress clearly did not mean to exclude residents of two-thirds of the states from premium tax credits,” he said. “Judge Friedman had little trouble finding that the statute clearly authorizes premium tax credits to be granted through federal exchanges … His reasoning is persuasive, and will be upheld by the appellate court.”
Other legal experts were even more dismissive of the case.
“This definitely was the right decision,” said Abigail Moncrieff, a professor at Boston University School of Law. “This case is pure silliness.”
But Michael Cannon, a health policy director at the Cato Institute in Washington who developed the legal theory against the IRS rule, said Wednesday’s ruling “will not be the last word.”
“Halbig and its companion cases concern whether the IRS can impose a tax when doing so is the exact opposite of what the law permits the agency to do,” he said. “Incredibly, a federal court has ruled the answer is yes.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- U.S. attorney warns N.Y. Gov. Andrew Cuomo not to interfere with anti-corruption probes
- Russians are unfazed by the West's response to Putin's actions in Ukraine: poll
- Rep. Tim Murphy: GOP knew HealthCare.gov would be an 'unmitigated disaster'
- Ohio gives Obama a thumbs down, yet Hillary Clinton tops GOP all-stars: poll
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Both parties recognize the Democrats' scam
- Inside the Ring: Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Army's 3-D printed bombs to create 'a whole new universe' of lethal capabilities
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- GOP leaders delay border bill, leave Obama in control
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for
- Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- EDITORIAL: The real Lois Lerner exposed in newly released emails
- Colorado poll shows women tuning out Democrats' 'war on women' strategy
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world