- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
VA’s top law official won’t enforce voter-approved gay marriage ban
Question of the Day
Virginia’s top law enforcement official on Thursday said he would not defend the state’s voter-approved constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage and that he will actively work to overturn the law.
Virginia Attorney General Mark R. Herring, saying it’s “time for the commonwealth to be on the right side of history and the right side of the law,” also announced that he would join a federal lawsuit on behalf of two gay couples who are challenging the ban.
Advocates of same-sex marriage, including Gov. Terry McAuliffe, cheered the move, while opponents decried it as a gross misuse of the power of Mr. Herring’s office.
Virginia House Speaker William J. Howell, Stafford Republican, said in a statement that he was “very concerned” about the announcement and “the dangerous precedent it sets with regard to the rule of law.”
“The Attorney General has a constitutional and statutory obligation to enforce and defend the duly adopted laws and Constitution of Virginia,” Mr. Howell said. “This is not an obligation that can be taken lightly. The Attorney General’s decision today demonstrates a great deal of disregard for that obligation, as well as the legislative and democratic processes by which those laws are adopted.”
The amendment passed a public vote in 2006, 57 percent to 43 percent. But amid a growing number of states legalizing the unions, an NBC/Marist poll last year showed 54 percent of registered voters in the state now support same-sex marriage, compared with 38 percent who oppose it and 8 percent who are uncertain.
Mr. Herring, though he supports same-sex marriage, said the decision was based on his interpretation of the law and his duty.
“There are those who will say that the attorney general is required to defend every challenge to a state law, even a law that is unconstitutional,” said Mr. Herring. “They could not be more wrong.”
The Democrat said at a Thursday news conference in Richmond that an attorney general has a “duty to support those laws that are constitutional and validly adopted.”
“And an attorney general has just as strong an obligation and duty not to defend laws that he has concluded are unconstitutional after a careful and thorough review. And it’s that simple,” he said.
He cited the precedents of former Attorney General Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II, a Republican who refused to defend a state education law last year, and former Attorney General Jerry Kilgore, a Republican who signed on with more than 40 attorneys general in 2003 to argue that an attorney general “is properly carrying out his constitutional duties when he seeks to invalidate a state law that he believes, in his independent judgment, to be unconstitutional.”
Thursday’s announcement does not legalize same-sex marriage in Virginia, and the attorney general noted that the ban will be in effect as the legal case winds its way through the judicial system. A hearing is scheduled for Jan. 30.
If the challenge is successful, Virginia could join Utah and Oklahoma in having voter-approved prohibitions on same-sex marriage lifted when federal courts intervened.
Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act, which bars the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriage in states, as unconstitutional. Mr. Herring said the Constitution is “the law of the land” and a state law and state constitution cannot trump it.
“I swore a duty to uphold both, and the Supreme Court is clear — the United States Constitution is the law of the land, [the] supreme law of the land,” he said.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Wilder, Cuccinelli may be called as witnesses in McDonnell trial
- Former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell's trial to test definitions of political corruption
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
- Mich. congressman returns Commerce award after group endorses opponent
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: 'Playing defense on the one-yard line'
Latest Blog Entries
- Dick Cheney: Hillary Clinton 'clearly bears responsibility' on Benghazi
- Holder vows to press ahead on gun control fight
- Seven of 10 prefer that Obama work with Congress, not go around it: Poll
- Schumer: Tea party hasn't let Obama put his policies into effect
- GOP official: Black not running for Wolf's House seat
TWT Video Picks
By David Keene
Allowing states to innovate could reduce dependency on bureaucracy
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- White House defends Kerry failure to broker Middle East cease-fire
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia's gay marriage ban
- Federal judge rules D.C. ban on handguns in public is unconstitutional
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq