- Donald Rumsfeld has ‘no idea’ if he paid taxes correctly
- Bradley Manning named honorary grand marshal of San Francisco Pride parade
- Look out PayPal: Facebook working toward mobile payments system
- U.S. rebukes Iran’s U.N. envoy pick over 1979 embassy attack
- Stoned mom avoids jail after driving 12 miles with baby on roof
- More than 100 ‘inappropriate’ encounters between NYC school staffers, students since 2009: report
- Joe Biden to Boston bombing survivors: ‘America will never, ever stand down’
- FBI failed to throughly vet Boston bombing suspect after Russian lead, report finds
- Atlanta Braves flooded with Hank Aaron hate mail: He’s a ‘scumbag’
- University: Help, our campus is too white
VA’s top law official won’t enforce voter-approved gay marriage ban
Virginia’s top law enforcement official on Thursday said he would not defend the state’s voter-approved constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage and that he will actively work to overturn the law.
Virginia Attorney General Mark R. Herring, saying it’s “time for the commonwealth to be on the right side of history and the right side of the law,” also announced that he would join a federal lawsuit on behalf of two gay couples who are challenging the ban.
Advocates of same-sex marriage, including Gov. Terry McAuliffe, cheered the move, while opponents decried it as a gross misuse of the power of Mr. Herring’s office.
Virginia House Speaker William J. Howell, Stafford Republican, said in a statement that he was “very concerned” about the announcement and “the dangerous precedent it sets with regard to the rule of law.”
“The Attorney General has a constitutional and statutory obligation to enforce and defend the duly adopted laws and Constitution of Virginia,” Mr. Howell said. “This is not an obligation that can be taken lightly. The Attorney General’s decision today demonstrates a great deal of disregard for that obligation, as well as the legislative and democratic processes by which those laws are adopted.”
The amendment passed a public vote in 2006, 57 percent to 43 percent. But amid a growing number of states legalizing the unions, an NBC/Marist poll last year showed 54 percent of registered voters in the state now support same-sex marriage, compared with 38 percent who oppose it and 8 percent who are uncertain.
Mr. Herring, though he supports same-sex marriage, said the decision was based on his interpretation of the law and his duty.
“There are those who will say that the attorney general is required to defend every challenge to a state law, even a law that is unconstitutional,” said Mr. Herring. “They could not be more wrong.”
The Democrat said at a Thursday news conference in Richmond that an attorney general has a “duty to support those laws that are constitutional and validly adopted.”
“And an attorney general has just as strong an obligation and duty not to defend laws that he has concluded are unconstitutional after a careful and thorough review. And it’s that simple,” he said.
He cited the precedents of former Attorney General Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II, a Republican who refused to defend a state education law last year, and former Attorney General Jerry Kilgore, a Republican who signed on with more than 40 attorneys general in 2003 to argue that an attorney general “is properly carrying out his constitutional duties when he seeks to invalidate a state law that he believes, in his independent judgment, to be unconstitutional.”
Thursday’s announcement does not legalize same-sex marriage in Virginia, and the attorney general noted that the ban will be in effect as the legal case winds its way through the judicial system. A hearing is scheduled for Jan. 30.
If the challenge is successful, Virginia could join Utah and Oklahoma in having voter-approved prohibitions on same-sex marriage lifted when federal courts intervened.
Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act, which bars the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriage in states, as unconstitutional. Mr. Herring said the Constitution is “the law of the land” and a state law and state constitution cannot trump it.
“I swore a duty to uphold both, and the Supreme Court is clear — the United States Constitution is the law of the land, [the] supreme law of the land,” he said.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- McAuliffe's PAC off to fast start, with $254,000 raised in two weeks
- Virginia Republican Bob Marshall stands by remarks that raise eyebrows
- Obama urged to enforce ban on importing military-style firearms
- Va. Senate approves Medicaid expansion, but budget stands no chance in House
- GOP's Comstock cast '08 Democrat ballot as part of 'Operation Chaos'
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By returning to goodness, the nation can achieve greatness once again
- Fuel-filled wings, ability to swarm: Pentagon offers glimpse at future of drone fleet
- Secret U.S. assessments show Afghanistan not ready to govern on own
- U.S. military on high alert as Ukraine troops trade gunfire with pro-Russian militants
- Russian fighter jet buzzes U.S. Navy destroyer in Black Sea
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Kirsten Dunst: Actress sparks feminist ire: 'You need a man to be a man'
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- WEBER: Obamacare cuts home healthcare for millions of seniors
- PHILLIPS: What did Harry Reid know and when did he know it?
- Nevada Bundy ranch standoff could leave dirt on Harry Reid reputation
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Chaos as Manhattan building explodes