EDITORIAL: Abandoning orphan earmarks

Congress should find a good home for idle pork money

Story Topics
Question of the Day

What has been the biggest debacle on Obama's watch?

View results

Earmarks feed the congressional favor factory. They’re the reward House and Senate leaders hand out to members in return for toeing the party line. Members see sending home money for a freeway overpass or a trolley line as the best way to prove to home folks that they’re getting a lot of free stuff in return for their votes.

When earmarking was at its most irresponsible in 2009, Citizens Against Government Waste calculated that “free” stuff was costing taxpayers almost $20 billion. Speaker John A. Boehner, a Republican, took the gavel in 2011 and imposed a temporary moratorium on earmarks that is still in place today.

That was a good start, but there’s more to killing earmarks than preventing the birthing of new ones. Before the ban took effect, Congress allocated billions of dollars to fund thousands of earmark projects that were never completed. This money is collecting dust. Some of these long-term unobligated earmarks, or “orphan” earmarks, are more than 25 years old.

According to the Congressional Research Service, clerical error, such as an incorrect road name, can keep the money banked. Other earmarks approved a project, but allocated not enough money, so the concrete was never poured. Occasionally, a state or local government pulled the plug when the locals realized the project wasn’t such a good idea after all.

This creates a purgatory for tax dollars that can’t be spent because the projects don’t exist or will never be completed. Appropriations rules decree that the money can’t be returned to taxpayers because the federal government has no way to collect earmarked money.

A light bulb flashed over the heads of Sen. Tom Coburn, Oklahoma Republican, and Sen. Claire McCaskill, Missouri Democrat, and both decided the rules should be changed. They think the unspent money should return to the U.S. Treasury if it hasn’t been spent within 10 years.

This use-it-or-lose-it policy for transportation earmarks would recoup $125.7 million in unused earmark cash this year, according to the Department of Transportation. If a law is in place next year, the 10th anniversary of a highway bill that dispatched more than 7,000 earmarks, taxpayers could see hundreds of millions — perhaps even billions — of dollars returned to federal vaults. The federal government would have to take less from the American taxpayer and borrow less from China.

The idea of sending back unused earmark money is not new. In 2011, Congress voted to reclaim a number of unused defense and highway earmarks, saving $630 million. The next year, President Obama enabled $473 million designated for 671 stalled earmark projects to go to the states to be used for other transportation purposes. This is often used as a way to generate quick cash during budget negotiations.

It’s an idea that ought to be made permanent. It’s the next step, and a necessary one, to move Congress away from the old way of doing things that put the nation $17.6 trillion in debt. If America’s factories are to run again, the congressional favor factory must be shut down for good.

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts