House GOP probes on IRS, Benghazi bring peril for Dems

Loyalties to Obama, constituents at stake

Question of the Day

What has been the biggest debacle on Obama's watch?

View results

With votes looming to create a special committee to investigate the Benghazi attacks, hold former IRS official Lois G. Lerner in contempt of Congress and demand a special counsel to look into the IRS, House Republicans have created a political minefield for Democrats in tough re-election races.

The votes all pit Congress against the White House and the broader Obama administration over key transparency questions — though they also open Republicans to charges of political grandstanding.


SEE ALSO: Pelosi says she ‘couldn’t care less’ about Benghazi criticism


First up this week is a vote on holding Ms. Lerner, former head of the Internal Revenue Service’s tax-exempt organizations office, in contempt of Congress. That will be coupled with a vote officially asking the Justice Department to appoint a special prosecutor to look into the tax agency for inappropriate scrutiny of tea party organizations.

Late last week, House Republican leaders said they also would move to create a special select committee to investigate the 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi, Libya, and the administration’s response. That vote, too, could go to the floor this week.

“It’s clear that questions remain, and the administration still does not respect the authority of Congress to provide proper oversight,” House Speaker John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, said in announcing the move. “This dismissiveness and evasion requires us to elevate the investigation to a new level.”

That the votes are so close together is somewhat of an accident.

“We’ve ended up at this place ultimately for the same reasons: that’s the refusal to cooperate with legitimate inquiries and requests for legitimate information by Congress,” said Doug Heye, a spokesman for House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Virginia Republican.

Mr. Heye predicted that the House will pass the resolutions without difficulty, given the Republican majority.


SEE ALSO: Ayotte: ‘Not too late’ on Benghazi: ‘We have to get to the bottom of this’


But red-state Democrats in the House, some of whom are fighting for their political lives, will have to decide whether to side with the embattled president and resist the investigations and questions or whether to vote with Republicans.

Republicans are certain to point to every Democratic vote for one of the investigations or referrals as added credence.

Jim Manley, a Democratic strategist and senior director at QGA Public Affairs, said he would advise Democrats to resist pressure to vote for the investigations and referrals.

“I don’t think they should — at least in the House. They come from safe enough districts that most of them should be able to appreciate the fact that this is nothing other than partisan-driven overreach,” he said. “I’m sure some will vote for some or all of them, but I’m not sure the vast majority need to.”

He said the votes present a “classic example of [Republicans] energizing their base.”

Republicans said their hands were forced on Benghazi by the revelation last week that the State Department failed for months to turn over an email — which they said was part of a subpoena issued last year — showing a top White House official urging the U.S. ambassador to blame an anti-Islam video for sparking protests on Benghazi and other U.S. posts in the region.

Even if the House votes for a Benghazi commission, which seems likely, it’s unclear whether Democratic leaders will appoint members.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks