- The Washington Times - Wednesday, August 6, 2003

Patrick Loughney considers his offices in the Library of Congress’ Moving Image Section as a triage center for aging films. Mr. Loughney, head of the Moving Image Section’s Motion Picture, Broadcasting and Recorded Sound Division, says it’s an archivist’s job to determine which old films require immediate care and which ones can wait a few years before getting a face-lift.

Film — be it the theatrical motion picture variety or homegrown reels stored in the family attic — is made of a plastic base topped by a thin layer of emulsion with silver particles and color dyes, or, in the case of black-and-white images, simply silver particles.

Any of these elements can break down, forcing archivists to improve storage or attend to them should degradation occur. The enemy is “father time,” or, more specifically, excess or fluctuating humidity levels, moisture or high temperatures.

Mr. Loughney estimates that “over half of films made in America are lost or survive in badly degraded form.”

Films made before the 1950s are much more of a concern, and not simply because of their antiquated nature. Film in those days was made of nitrate cellulose, a highly flammable substance with sulfuric acid as one of its building blocks. The material also was susceptible to shrinkage and brittleness.

In the early 1950s, Kodak introduced a “safety film” made of cellulose acetate plastic that didn’t have the flammable properties of the old film. The new film did, however, feature unstable color dyes that could fade over time, as well as shrinkage.

The cyan, or blue, and yellow dyes used in the color process reacted to heat and humidity, he says, and would leave behind a red tint after years of damage.

Ken Wlaschin, vice chairman of the National Center for Film and Video Preservation with the American Film Institute’s Hollywood office, says the newer film also suffers from “vinegar syndrome,” which some say makes it not so much better than the pre-1950s films.

The syndrome, named after the sharp smell the film emits, involves a slow chemical deterioration that makes the film buckle and shrink over time when exposed to unfriendly storage atmospheres.

The Image Permanence Institute in Rochester, N.Y., part of the Rochester Institute of Technology, created and sells A-D Strips, dye-coated paper that detects the level of deterioration in acetate photographic film collections. The strips can tell how extensive the damage is to a particular piece of film and whether it should be duplicated.

Film manufacturers in recent years have improved their products so color fading is much less of a problem.

The best way to avoid deterioration is to store older films properly. Generally, films are kept in a cold storage area with steady humidity. An ideal temperature is 45 degrees Fahrenheit, with a 35 percent humidity level, Mr. Loughney says.

Dwight Swanson, archivist with Northeast Historic Film in Bucksport, Maine, says while major film studios are storing films properly, many homeowners still are not.

“Moisture really is a thing that does the most damage,” Mr. Swanson says, particularly if the films sit in rusty metal cans.

The best way to store film is in archival-quality metal or plastic cases. As long as the housing material is chemically inert, the film should be fine, he says. Old 8 millimeter films came back from the labs in metal cans that weren’t meant to be archival-quality, he says.

Another source of potential damage for home movies is a poorly maintained projector, which can “do huge damage to the sprocket holes … and can eat up the film,” Mr. Swanson says.

Key allies in the preservation movement are the film studios themselves. Grover Crisp, vice president of asset management and film restoration for Sony Pictures Entertainment, says most studios have had preservation programs in place for at least a decade.

One motivating factor is economics. Studios can restore and rerelease old films for new audiences as part of theatrical releases and DVD packages.

“The entire business of DVD has impacted what I do in a very positive way,” Mr. Crisp says.

Preservation typically means making a film-to-film copy, ensuring that a film has a solid backup should anything happen to the original. Restoration is more complex and more expensive.

The restored version of Frank Capra’s 1939 classic “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington” took source material from five copies of the film. The project, which took more than three years, cost $100,000.

Mr. Crisp says the film restoration process begins with a thorough examination of the source materials available. Those materials could be either the master negative from which film prints were made or those prints themselves. If the latter are in good condition, they can provide enough detail to create a new, crisp print.

“If we were fortunate that other materials were made from the [films] negative prior to the damage, that’s where we can pull clean material,” he says. “If we don’t have that … then we may consider newer digital technology.”

The film’s audio track is always restored through some version of digital processing, Mr. Crisp says, with computers removing anomalies, pops and crackling sounds.

His company takes that digital approach when restoring the film’s visuals, he says. “It’s not always achievable. You’re always captive of the material you have and the quality of that material.”

Most of the software used to blur away wrinkles, cracks and other film imperfections is built upon software used to create today’s special effects, Mr. Crisp says. Filmmakers can make an actor fly using wires, then erase the wires later using that software. Film defects are eliminated the same way, he says.

“If you have one frame that has damage to it, you merge the information from the clean frame before or after it, in essence paint over it,” Mr. Crisp says. “That one-frame difference is unnoticeable.”

Among the hardest conditions to fix are the color abnormalities caused by degraded dyes, says Mr. Crisp, who describes the work of recouping fading colors as “hit or miss.” Just two laboratories in the country handle such requests, he says.

Once all the bumps and bruises are straightened out, the restoration team records the new material onto a new negative and print for future use.

Mr. Loughney’s team helps catalog the many films shipped to their offices. Should a film need work, it is sent to the Library of Congress Motion Picture Conservation Center on Wright Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio.

Mr. Wlaschin, along with other archival experts, says films stored in digital formats aren’t considered truly “preserved.”

“We preserve film on film,” Mr. Wlaschin says. “We don’t know how long digital will last.”

Plus, who knows if today’s DVD format, for example, will even exist in 30 years?

“You have to have the machinery on which it’s made, in a sense, to use it again,” he says.

The fruit of archivists’ labors can be seen in retrospectives such as this month’s showcase devoted to early Warner Bros. films. The Library of Congress and the National Gallery of Art will present films from the early 1930s, the bulk of which reflect preservation efforts made through the Library of Congress.

The free screenings will be held over the next four weekends in the National Gallery’s East Building auditorium on Constitution Avenue and Fourth Street NW.For more information, call 202/737-4215.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide