- The Washington Times - Saturday, July 12, 2003

Did Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden have access to a U.S. computer tracking program that enabled them to monitor our intelligence-gathering efforts and financial transactions? If so, who is responsible for allowing the program to fall into their hands? And who else among U.S. enemies might have access to the tracking system?

It’s an explosive spy software scandal that no one in official Washington wants to investigate.

This complex, tangled story began two decades ago, when a tiny private company called Inslaw, Inc., developed a software package to help U.S. attorneys’ offices in large urban districts keep tabs on their criminal prosecutors’ caseloads. The program, dubbed the Prosecutor’s Management Information System (Promis), was effective and popular. It allowed a prosecutor to locate defendants and witnesses, track motions and monitor investigations. In 1982, Inslaw won a large Justice Department contract to implement the system nationwide.

In the meantime, Inslaw also developed privately owned enhancements to Promis. Despite contractual guarantees of Inslaw’s proprietary rights to the enhanced version of Promis, the Justice Department essentially commandeered the improved program for its own uses without paying for it. Inslaw was forced into bankruptcy and began an endless fight with the Justice Department to recoup its losses.

In the course of their court battles, Inslaw founder Bill Hamilton and his wife innocently stumbled upon shocking national security revelations. Former Attorney General Ed Meese, the Hamiltons concluded, had conspired to force Inslaw into bankruptcy so that an old Meese crony, California businessman Earl Brian, could take over the company’s assets. The Hamiltons obtained information through sworn affidavits of several individuals that suggested Mr. Meese, Mr. Brian, high-ranking Justice Department official Peter Videnieks and others wanted to modify and distribute the enhanced Promis software with “back door” capabilities for covert intelligence operations.

Sound preposterous?

In 1987, a federal judge blasted the Justice Department for stealing Promis. The government, Judge George Bason said, stole Inslaw’s software through “trickery, fraud and deceit” with “contempt for both the law and any principle of fair dealing.” The House Judiciary Committee also found in 1992 that there was “strong evidence” the Justice Department had conspired to steal the Promis program. An internal Justice Department memo made public by the committee revealed that the Justice Department had secretly turned over a copy of Promis to the Israeli government.

An extensive four-part series by Insight magazine reporter Kelly Patricia O’Meara retraced a lengthy investigation by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police two years ago that “uncovered a network involving friend and foe alike that may be using Promis and systems like it for a variety of illegal activities worldwide.”

In June 2001, Jerry Seper of The Washington Times reported that former FBI agent and convicted spy Robert Hanssen sold an enhanced version of Promis for $2 million to Russian crime figures, who in turn are suspected of selling a black-market version of it to Osama bin Laden.

More recently, the International Currency Review, a London-based financial newsletter, reportedly obtained Iraqi intelligence documents alleging that Promis came into Saddam’s possession under the Bush I administration. The publication’s editor says the documents were owned by Saddam’s half-brother, Barzan al Takriti.

And last week, British news outlets suggested that the resignation of top Bush terrorism intelligence official Paul Redmond was tied to his investigation of Hanssen and the Promis theft. The Department of Homeland Security claims that Mr. Redmond, a legendary spy catcher who came out of retirement to take the Bush administration position and had served only three months, left for “health reasons.”

The odor of a cover-up is unmistakable. To this day, the Justice Department, FBI and other government agencies continue to insist that they have never possessed or used any pirated version of Promis. Career Justice officials who oversaw the theft of the Hamiltons’ software program in the 1980s remain in place today. And according to my sources, the September 11 commission created by President Bush has declined to investigate this spy software fiasco and its possible role in facilitating the terrorist attacks on the United States.

Inslaw deserves to be compensated. More importantly, the American people deserve to know the truth: Did government greed and bureaucratic hubris lead to a wholesale sellout of our national security? The Bush White House’s credibility is on the line.

Michelle Malkin is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide