- The Washington Times - Wednesday, March 17, 2004

Listening to the political and media rhetoric about the war in Iraq, you would think only President Bush believed Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. Here are just a few past statements made by Mr. Bush’s critics.

President Clinton (1998): “One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line.”

Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright (February 1998): “Iraq is a long way from here, but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face.”

In 2002, Al Gore said, “We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.”

Also in 2002, Sen. Ted Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat, said, “We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.”

Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts and Democratic presidential front-runner, said in 2002, “I will be voting to give the president of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.”

In January 2003, Mr. Kerry added: “Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime. … He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. … And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real.”

The fact is former President Clinton, as well as many members of Congress, believed, just as Mr. Bush did, that Saddam possessed or was developing biological, chemical and nuclear weapons. The widespread attacks on Mr. Bush are little more than political demagoguery and grandstanding and depend on public forgetfulness and ignorance to succeed.

Military intelligence will probably always be an inexact science. Let’s go back to Franklin Roosevelt’s administration. By mid-1940, the “evidence” became so promising about Germany’s nuclear-weapons program that British and American scientists judged it imprudent to continue publishing new results. Further research in the United States and Britain was done in secret to prevent German scientists from using the findings to develop an atomic bomb of their own for use in the war then under way.

The frightening possibility Germany might succeed in providing Adolf Hitler with a nuclear weapon was one of the driving forces for the U.S. Manhattan Project. It was also the reason for some of the strategic targeting during World War II, including heavy water facilities in Nazi-occupied Norway.

When the war ended, it was discovered Germany wasn’t nearly as close to developing an atomic bomb as intelligence experts had thought. Fortunately, back then we didn’t have today’s hustling politicians and gullible public to criticize either our war strategy or the atomic bombing of Japan. Americans were thankful we got the bomb first and used it to end the war.

Listening to today’s politicians and what goes for informed media commentary, George Bush should have waited for unambiguous proof a megalomaniac tyrant like Saddam had nuclear-chemical-biological weapons. I am wondering if that unambiguous proof sufficient for America’s political hustlers and gullible public would have been a mushroom cloud over one of our cities or millions of Americans suffering and dying from chemical or biological toxins.

Walter Williams is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide