- The Washington Times - Saturday, May 14, 2005

What started yesterday as a D.C. Council hearing on private financing options for the Washington Nationals’ new stadium quickly devolved into a verbal war on land costs for the planned ballpark.

Natwar Gandhi, District chief financial officer, received a vicious line of questioning from several council members, including David Catania, at-large independent, and Marion Barry, Ward 8 Democrat.

In March Gandhi estimated the land acquisition, environmental and infrastructure costs for the Southeast stadium site to be $161.4million, but Catania and Barry yesterday said that number is based on badly outdated or irrelevant real estate comparables and faulty methodology. Even council chairman Linda Cropp, who previously accepted Gandhi’s findings, briefly challenged the report.

Had Gandhi’s total on those land costs exceeded $165million, the District would have been forced to seek out a cheaper ballpark site. Most of the property in the stadium site, near the Anacostia River waterfront, is held by a disparate group of private landowners.

“You have completely manipulated and contrived these numbers, and when we’re actually paying upwards of $200million for the land acquisition instead of the $77million you’re suggesting, you’re going to be long gone and we’re going to be left with a huge burden on the taxpayers of the District of Columbia,” Catania said. “I absolutely believe this to be malfeasance.”

Barry took an opposite approach, unsuccessfully seeking a pledge from Gandhi to resign his job if the final costs for those parts of the stadium project exceed his estimate by more than 5 percent.

Barry and Catania also took sharp aim at a disclaimer in the land cost report saying it is not intended to be relied upon as a formal appraisal of market values.

Gandhi, predictably, bristled at the heated accusations and called the line of inquiry “disrespectful.” Mayor Anthony A. Williams also said he was disappointed at the council’s treatment of Gandhi.

The land cost estimate was compiled with the aid of professional consultants from Deloitte & Touche, and Gandhi said the projected land costs are adjusted to inflation and include fees for several infrastructure projects, such as the potential $27million relocation of a sewer line under the stadium site, that ultimately may not be needed.

“I am thoroughly appalled by how Mr. Catania has misrepresented this report,” Gandhi said. “Our study was never intended to be the instrument by which we go out and negotiate to buy the land.”

While tensions ran high during Gandhi’s testimony in the seven-hour hearing, public attendance in the council chambers was barely a fraction of the standing-room-only hearings and votes on the stadium issue last fall.

The session was the first of a two-part public roundtable, concluding Monday, to consider legislation now before the council to include private financing into the stadium project. Cropp led a movement last fall to mandate a search for private funds for at least 50 percent of the hard construction costs as a means to lower the project’s public-sector investment.

Deutsche Bank, which submitted an offer of $246million of debt financing and is favored by Williams, conversely received a gentler line of questioning, but the bid is far from the political slam dunk it was a week ago. The Deutsche Bank plan, designed to act in concert with District bonds, also has been recommended formally by Gandhi. But several council members said yesterday they did not see how the plan demonstrably lowers the city’s overall indebtedness.

“We borrow some of the money from them instead of bonding everything, we’re still on hook. The money still needs to be paid back,” said Jack Evans, council finance committee chairman.

Instead, District sources said last night Cropp is actively seeking to develop council support for D.C. Baseball Stadium Associates, a renamed version of the BW Realty Advisors group that last fall helped spur Cropp toward private financing. The group intends to finance the project through a complex blend of traditional debt financing, equity investment and depreciation tax benefits and wants to take over lead status on the stadium development process.

The group’s bid was not certified by Gandhi, and it is uncertain whether that will allow the District to sign a deal. But D.C. Baseball Stadium Associates testified yesterday at the invitation of Cropp and Evans, as did Deutsche Bank and five other companies that submitted private financing proposals.

Richard Gross, D.C. Baseball Stadium Associates principal, boasted that its plan “is cheaper than anything else out there” and took direct aim at its competitors, including Deutsche Bank.

“I’ve thought all along this proposal is the one true private financing out there,” Cropp said.

The council is slated to vote on the private financing bill by the end of June. If no plan is adopted, the existing District-based financing plan approved in December remains in use. That plan relies on a four-pronged revenue stream led by gross-receipts taxes on District businesses.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide