- The Washington Times - Friday, October 7, 2005

Welcome to the trenches of the culture wars, where academic notions of political correctness, multiculturalism and cultural relativism meet the brawling American street.

c New York Gov. George Pataki just nixed the idea of an International Freedom Center to be located next to the proposed new World Trade Center and its own September 11, 2001, memorial. Center overseers — architects, academics and corporate elites — felt by also focusing on the horrors of slavery, segregation and genocide, they could use the shrine to promote a more universal agenda in support of the oppressed.

Most of the families of the September 11 victims, along with police and firefighters, begged to differ. So they organized to “take back the memorial.” They feel that there are better places for political lessons than Ground Zero, where their family members and friends were incinerated by fascistic al Qaeda terrorists.

c The current Hollywood hit “Flightplan” has incensed airline flight attendants and officers, many of whom are boycotting the movie. The film portrays some of them as rude and dense, and others as playing around, while criminals divert their airplane under their noses. Two of the plotters are, in fact, a female flight attendant and an air marshal.

The obvious touchstone for the movie is September 11, a mass murder in which airline employees did all they could to stop one of the four hijacked planes from crashing into the U.S. Capitol. Some had their throats slits by murderous terrorists from the Middle East — birthplace of airplane hijacking in the 1970s. But Hollywood reversed historical reality, making the flight staff in the film either clueless or culpable with innocent Middle Easterners on board are unfairly under suspicion.

c Recently, a federal judge granted an American Civil Liberties Union motion to release most of the remaining photographs and videotapes from Abu Ghraib. The ACLU lawyers argued, and the judge concurred, a free society such as ours must air all its dirty laundry.

Soldiers, on the other hand, responded that, in this war, more lurid photos beamed worldwide without context will only help the killers. Those in harm’s way fighting the terrorists will find it even harder to win the hearts and minds of civilian populations.

c Then there is the question of balance. There have been multiple investigations of Abu Ghraib, several publicized trials and numerous convictions, and plenty of exposes by journalists — far more coverage than that devoted to the beheading and torture of American captives or daily murders by terrorists.

On the one side of all these controversies seem to be architects, curators, academics, chief executive officers, journalists, scriptwriters, actors, lawyers and judges. Their utopian views of what their fellow Americans should see, think and feel are at odds with those of grieving families, police, firefighters, flight attendants and soldiers.

Those on museum boards, in Hollywood studios and in the courtroom seek to fashion the intellectual landscape in which those who put out fires, arrest criminals, serve food and shoot terrorists are to operate. The latter fight back. They try to match elite influence with public outrage, and so appeal to their elected officials and unions, and to talk shows, the blogosphere and cable news.

The issue is not just one of class division, but rather also concerns theory when it translates into actual practice. A privileged group speculates about abstract issues, and others must concretely bear the consequences of this contemplation.

Families of the September 11 victims, with good cause, fear they will hear from tourists to a new World Trade Center with an adjacent International Freedom Center that we deserved September 11 due to America’s treatment of Native Americans or African-Americans a century ago. Airline attendants suspect future passengers may be a little more skeptical of their efforts to enforce Federal Aviation Administration protocols, while troops dodging bullets in Iraq know it could now be more difficult to get intelligence from civilians.

In the worldview of billionaire philanthropist George Soros, a backer of the International Freedom Center, or the ACLU, to be good, America must be nearly perfect — broadcasting past sins even at Ground Zero, where its citizens were murdered by fascists, or replaying ad nauseam to the world the crimes of a few rogue soldiers of a million-man military.

But others in heavy boots and coats who carry hoses upstairs or soldiers sweltering in body armor in the desert seem happy enough to do the best they can. Or in the words of one of the organizers who stopped the Freedom Center, “We want a place that projects the goodness of people.”

The irony of it all? Liberalism once was also populist. Yet lately the left has often adopted a condescending attitude toward the so-called people, trivializing the folks in the trenches in assorted uniforms and camouflage who supposedly need guidance and moral enlightenment from their elite betters.

Maybe that’s precisely what worries Democratic stalwarts like Hillary Clinton, who wisely came out against putting the so-called International Freedom Center at the epicenter of the September 11 mass murder.

Victor Davis Hanson is a nationally syndicated columnist and a classicist and historian at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. His new book is “A War Like No Other: How the Athenians and Spartans Fought the Peloponnesian War.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide