Related Stories
India’s Muslims split in response to Hindu temple verdict
SC court: Prosecutor’s remarks in murder trial ‘improper’
Trump asks Supreme Court to void financial records subpoena
Secretly recorded conversations admissible in criminal cases
State loses bid for high court review of opioid suit ruling
Washington state gets first Native American justice
Court seems ready to curb claims over Montana Superfund site
Supreme Court hears challenge to New York City’s ban on transporting firearms
The Latest: Justices weighing dismissal of guns case
Roberts seems to hold key to case over New York City gun law
Justices take up gun case, though disputed law has changed
With $1 bil timber lawsuit, not all counties are big winners
Supreme Court set to hear first major gun control case since 2010
Who made the new drapes? It’s among high court’s mysteries
Photos
Quotations
In upholding the conviction, the court said the case illustrates why excluding evidence from illegal recordings “may, at times, prove to be an ill-suited tool for protecting an individual’s privacy,” the Chronicle reported.
Secretly recorded conversations admissible in criminal cases →
The court said such comments were “blatantly improper.” The prosecutor was not named in court records.
