- The Washington Times - Tuesday, September 27, 2005

Evacuations are not benign. Twenty-four people died when a bus carrying 38 Houston nursing-home residents and six employees caught fire in a traffic jam. It’s believed oxygen tanks used by elderly evacuees had a role in the fire.

Given the hurricane predictions for Houston and Galveston, one can’t blame officials for ordering evacuations. But the lesson is that evacuations can be costly. In addition to injuries and loss of life, when evacuations are ordered, there are costs associated with opportunistic criminal behavior such as looting, of which there were reports in Houston.

Hurricane Rita provided us another evacuation lesson as millions sought to leave Houston and Galveston. Gasoline stations ran out of fuel, leaving hundreds of motorists stranded. Many abandoned their cars. Police officers were deployed to carry gas to motorists with empty tanks. Texas authorities also asked the Pentagon for help in getting gas to stranded motorists. Much of the blame for the shortage rests at the feet of Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, who recently ordered penalties of up to $20,000 per incident of price-gouging. You say, “How come you blame Greg Abbott?” Let’s look at it.

When the hurricane evacuation order came, there was an immediate change in the demand for gasoline; namely, demand became much greater than available supply. Retailers, in fear of prosecution, didn’t do what would have brought demand more in line with the available supplies of gasoline — raise prices.

Suppose a family evacuating Houston chose to make a 146-mile drive to stay with relatives in Austin. Their car has a half a tank of gasoline — plenty to get to Austin — but just to be safe, they decide to fill up. What do you think they might do if they expected to pay $2.75 a gallon but when they got to the gas station they found the gas selling for $3.75. I bet they would say, “The heck with that; we’ll fill up in Austin.”

That’s wonderful; they would have voluntarily made gas available for someone running out of gas. In my book, for a motorist who’s running on empty, gas available at $3.75 a gallon is preferable to gas unavailable at $2.75 a gallon.

Mr. Abbott also threatened legal action against what he called “unconscionable pricing” by hotels. Take that same family. The husband might have said, “Honey, I don’t feel like driving all the way to Austin to stay with your mother and father; let’s rent a room.” When they get to the hotel, the rooms are no longer $75 a night but $150. The husband says, “OK, I’ll put up with the in-laws.” That’s wonderful, too. They’ve made a room available for a family with no alternative.

Market allocation isn’t the only way to ensure people economize on suddenly scarce resources. Texas officials resorted to pleading with motorists not to top off their tanks. Their pleas were ignored. What Texas officials could have done was to place officers at every gas station to make sure people weren’t buying more gas than they needed to get to their destination. Texas officials also could have stationed hotel officers at every hotel. The job of the hotel officer would be to query potential guests whether they had nearby relatives or friends with whom they could spend a night or two. If they had relatives or friends within a reasonable distance, such as my example of the husband and wife with relatives in Austin, the hotel officer would tell them to hit the road. Would measures such as these have been preferable to rising prices or the unavailability of gas and lodging?

Don’t get me wrong. There’s nothing pleasant about rising prices in a disaster. My argument is that not allowing the market mechanism to allocate suddenly scarce resources produces the inferior outcome.

Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University and a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide