- The Washington Times - Tuesday, September 27, 2005

It took just 12 days from Israel’s complete withdrawal from Gaza before rockets started raining down on the Western Negev area from the now-unoccupied territory.

The attacks late Friday might have occurred sooner if the terrorists had not been preoccupied with torching synagogues and destroying flower-growing operations in Gaza that could have produced income for Palestinians. Their hatred of all things Jewish prompted them to act against their self-interest.

Late Sunday night, after crushing Israeli retaliatory attacks and threats from Prime Minister Ariel Sharon of an even greater response, the Hamas terrorists announced a halt to all attacks from the Gaza Strip. For now, perhaps. But given history, one can safely bet, not for good.

A Reuters story about the Israeli attacks on Saturday said, “The upsurge in violence was a blow to international hopes that the pullout could revive peacemaking.” The concept of international “hopes” is founded on the false premise that peace depends only on Israel’s behavior. Every time Israel offers concessions, withdrawals, confidence-building measures and other “good faith” gestures, the response is more terror, more death and no peace. Will there ever be a time when the U.S. and the international community concludes that forcing Israel into making unilateral concessions is not a prescription for peace, but a guarantee of more war?

Mr. Sharon, who faces a growing political challenge from former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, should have seen this coming because it has happened so often before.

Israeli Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz vowed a “crushing and unequivocal response.” Hamas blamed Israel for an explosion at a Hamas rally Friday, killing 15 people, though the Palestinian Authority said it seemed to have been an accident caused by Hamas members carrying explosives in a crowded area. Hamas vowed to resist any raid in Gaza and called for attacks on Israel.

Continuing his denial of the obvious, the top U.N. envoy to the Middle East, Alvaro de Soto, told the Security Council last Friday the “road map” remains the only realistic way to peace between Israel and the Palestinians. Not exactly. The road map requires reciprocity. So far, Israel has done all the giving and the Palestinian-Hamas-Fatah side all the taking and killing. Why should they stop when violence gives them what they want?

Commenting on Israel’s withdrawal, but ignoring the continuing terrorist threat, Mr. de Soto said, “Forces of moderation have prevailed over those of extremism.” You could have fooled me.

After Mr. de Soto spoke, the Security Council called again on both sides to adhere to the Road Map, saying the Gaza pullout must be only one step toward further Israeli withdrawal and efforts to achieve a viable Palestinian state.

The “quartet” of the U.N., the United States, Russia and the European Union has succeeded only in pressuring Israel to give and give and give. Whatever pressure it has applied to the Palestinian-Hamas-Fatah side has produced no cessation of violence, no disarmament and, in fact, no concessions at all.

It is frustrating that no one pays attention to the terrorists’ pronouncements. Hamas announced it would flood Gaza with its soldiers once Israel withdrew. Islamo-fascist clerics call for annihilation of Israel and tell jihadists it is their religious duty to kill Jews and Christians. Our “friends,” the Saudis and Egyptians allow this rhetoric to flow unimpeded from their mosques and in their government-run media.

Meanwhile, the Bush administration and its State Department sink deeper into denial and pretend the terrorists don’t mean what they say. The terrorists trumpet their plans and carry them out. After they have caused death and destruction, they promise more. Objectives can’t be made clearer than that.

Would a second coming of Benjamin Netanyahu as prime minister make a difference? Perhaps. He once told me he learned a valuable lesson from his own concessions during the Clinton administration. Mr. Netanyahu should tell Israelis and the world that if he again becomes prime minister he will not budge on more land concessions until the Palestinian-Hamas-Fatah side begins responding positively to all of Israel’s concessions.

Having given so much and received nothing in return, it may now be too late to save Israel, but giving more without getting anything ensures Israel’s extinction sooner, rather than later.

Cal Thomas is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide