- The Washington Times - Thursday, August 3, 2006

Don’t ever cost the Chinese face — do so and you’ll be slapped with U.N. economic sanctions.

Lost in last month’s tsunami of war news was the U.N. Security Council’s decision to sanction North Korea for its ballistic missile tantrum.

Despite years of pressure from the U.S. and Japan, China had been reluctant to chastise North Korea but was clearly surprised by North Korea’s July 5 missile volley. Saving face is important in every human group — “face” is particularly important in North Asia, in social relationships and diplomacy. The North Korean tantrum cost China a bit of public embarrassment. That embarrassment cost North Korea the humiliation of international economic sanctions.

Economic sanctions are crude weapons, but North Korea is in a particularly crude financial and political situation. The United States contends North Korea launders stolen money through corrupt banks in Macao (the Chinese port formerly run by Portugal). Chinese cooperation also enhances U.S. efforts to curb North Korea’s counterfeiting operations. That’s right — counterfeiting. Minting fake U.S. currency has been one of North Korea’s few profit centers.

The U.S. and Japan have proposed other economic penalties. Both countries have already used anti-organized-crime and anti-terror techniques to thwart currency remittances to Pyongyang from North Koreans living abroad.

North Korea’s Kim Jong-il operates an extortion racket. The North Korean totalitarian police state is a totalitarian crime state. The criminal enterprises (counterfeiting, smuggling drugs) keep its communist elites in caviar.

While North Korea’s clique trumpets development of nuclear weapons, more than 2 million of its citizens suffer from malnutrition. North Korea can build bombs and test missiles, but only international aid prevents mass starvation. Given the dictator’s ample paunch, it’s a good bet Kim and his elites eat well.

There has been a sharp increase in North Koreans fleeing to north China from their countrywide gulag. A Chinese army sits on the Korean border, tasked with stopping the refugees fleeing Mr. Kim. The refugee issue is one reason, among many, to doubt China’s long-term commitment to supporting Mr. Kim’s depraved junta.

Past North Korean bouts of international madness occasionally served Beijing’s strategic ends. Mr. Kim’s Stalinist regime rattles the U.S. and scares Japan. However, China and Russia now have extensive trade relations with Japan and South Korea. The South Korean economic powerhouse invests in China.

Japanese fear is producing changes in Japanese military doctrine. No one in Asia, particularly China, wants a militarily resurgent Japan. But North Korea’s ballistic missile barrage has ignited The Rising Sun. The Japanese government is now openly cooperating with the U.S. on anti-ballistic missile defense, including deployment of U.S.-made Patriot Pac-3 anti-missile missiles to Okinawa.

Defense is one thing — Japan’s “Self-Defense Forces” are designed to defend Japan. Offensive strike capability is something else entirely.

Last month, the London Times wrote that “Kim’s adventures” had radicalized Japanese opinion. ” ‘The vast majority of Japanese agree that we need to be able to carry out first strikes,’ said Yoichi Shimada, a professor of international relations at Fukui Prefectural University.” Mr. Shimada says Japan must “have an offensive missile capability.”

Japan could have offensive missiles in a couple of months. For that matter, Japan could produce a nuclear weapon within a few weeks.

Chinese and South Korean diplomats argue North Korea’s regime may be crazy but isn’t suicidal. Firing a missile at Japan — whether it has a nuke or not — would be a suicidal act, and the diplomats argue that won’t happen. But Beijing and Seoul cannot guarantee North Korea won’t try to sell a nuclear device to terrorists, which is one of Washington’s central concerns. Swap a nuke for a cool billion? Pyongyang’s crooked track record suggests Mr. Kim would do the deal.

Beijing has no interest in a nuclear-armed, U.S.-allied, economically powerful and reunified Korea — a little bulldog of a peninsula on China’s border. Propping up North Korea prevents reunification. Dropping the North Korean props could be traded for a reunified Korea that is politically neutral and nuclear-free.

Consider that a succinct look at “future diplomacy” — if North Asia succeeds in avoiding a Korean nuclear war in the dicey interim.

Austin Bay is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide