- The Washington Times - Sunday, February 12, 2006

St. Valentine’s Day, like a lot of other things, is rooted in love and war, tragedy and comedy. Emperor Claudius II is the man responsible for the February traffic in notes of love and romance. He needed disciplined soldiers to fight his Third Century wars, and reckoned that men unhindered by wives and children would make the best fighters. He outlawed marriage for his men. Valentine, a priest in Rome, didn’t think that was right. He secretly tied young lovers in knots.

He was beheaded for his trouble, which got him canonized, and lovers have been losing their heads on St. Valentine’s Day ever since. Cupid became the symbol of the holiday, armed with bow and arrow to stitch the hearts of lovers. Cupid shot himself in the foot so that Psyche would fall in love with him, but on the condition that she never look at him. When she opened her eyes, as a woman is wont to do, Cupid, suffering commitment terror, fled. There’s a modern moral hidden somewhere in that story.

Middle Ages custom required men to draw names of ladies from large urns and pin them on their sleeves, the first men to wear their hearts on their sleeves. When Ophelia goes mad over her passion for Hamlet, she sings a bawdy song about St. Valentine’s Day, reinforcing the idea that one can be madly in love.

Rites and wrongs for celebrating St. Valentine’s Day change with the times. The Victorian cards frilly with lace and flowers that our great-grandparents sent to each other often were accompanied by handwritten notes reflecting secret feelings. Now you can send the word by e-mail, with a selection of special fonts, dingbats and glyphs with which to woo. Longing for love has been become logging-on to romance.

Romancing on line has its risks, but it has become big business. Thousands of single men and women have visited dating sites since Match.com promised in 1995 that it could forge links to the heart with a questionnaire.Questions about religion, race, height, weight, hair and eye color, eating and drinking habits, attitudes toward money, sex, education, family plumbed the secret places of the heart. You get the idea. A Pew survey finds that 53 million Americans have gone out with someone they met through Internet web sites.

Lori Gottlieb, a modern Candide seeking the best of all possible worlds, tells how eHarmony, PerfectMatch.com and Chemistry.com have revolutionized romance. “All have staked their success on the idea that long-term romantic compatibility can be predicted according to scientific principles,” she writes in the Atlantic Monthly, “and that they can discover those principles and use them to help their members find lasting love.” They’ve developed a wide variety of questions based on research in psychology, anthropology and sociology. “Hello Dolly” this is not.

So confident is eHarmony that its “scientific” research works that it created a venture capital-funded think tank to study and evaluate its “relationship-enhancement service.” This laboratory for those seeking love on-line boasts that in a single year eHarmony “facilitated” the marriage of 33,000 members. Lori Gottlieb was not one of them. She was less than enchanted with the samples that arrived in her inbox, collected from suitors who answered the 436 questions on a personality test. Her prospects included a bald man with a handlebar moustache who she would have had to stand on a chair to kiss. He was 14 inches taller than she. Another profile was closer to her height, at four feet five inches, but he was too short. A third man sent a photograph of himself in a kilt, presumably thinking that hairy legs would entice. They didn’t.

Her replies sound a little like the replies to an early personal placed in the London Review of Books: “Shy, ugly man, fond of extended periods of self-pity, middle-aged, flatulent and overweight, seeks the impossible.” Elizabeth Barrett Browning this was not.

Personality profiles generated “scientifically” on-line do not always reflect men and women in the ways they see themselves. Groucho Marx might have said: “Anyone who wants to date someone with my profile isn’t someone I want to date.” Making a good match, online or elsewhere, requires a sense of humor. Richard Rodgers and Lorenz Hart understood that when they wrote: My funny Valentine Sweet comic valentine You make me smile with my heart Your looks are laughable, unphotographable Yet you’re my favorite work of art.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide