- The Washington Times - Thursday, November 16, 2006

Modern bureaucracy is the spine of the modern state. The modern state would not be as useful as it is without bureaucracy, or as wasteful or as lethargic. Reforming bureaucracy is the great challenge facing the greatest reformers, and that is why Donald Rumsfeld will be assessed by historians as a great secretary of defense. He initiated more than a hundred far-reaching reforms, and made policy changes that have made the American military probably the most effective in the world. Thanks to him, our ground forces are more rapidly deployable. The diverse branches of the military work together more closely. And ballistic missile defense is much advanced.

If he were as smooth as silk, he would still have plenty of enemies in Washington. The most difficult kind of bureaucracy to reform is the military. Not that Mr. Rumsfeld is not a gentleman, but he is also a man of action in time of war. Thanks to his rapid response and great strategic vision, Osama bin Laden is woebegone in a remote cave or perhaps crepe suzette for the worms. As for the tyrant Saddam Hussein, the worms have their eyes on him too. I hope those hungry worms have powerful digestive tracts.

So Don Rumsfeld disturbed the settled state of routine among some fatuous officers at the Pentagon. He has won the hearts of the fighting troops and of intelligent officers who recognize the vigor and intelligence that he has brought to our national security. Those who recognize we are more secure today than we were prior to September 11, 2001, will be forever grateful. Those who do not will remain forever ignorant.

Now in comes Bob Gates, and as is the custom in this town there is wild speculation. He is George Bush I’s guy. He is James Baker’s guy. He is the CIA’s guy. He is coming in from the presidency of Texas A & M to pull the plug on our involvement in Iraq. Actually, he is George Bush II’s appointee. And though I shall only mildly speculate, I suspect he will do as his boss tells him. That seems to mean he will apply a fresh set of eyes to Iraq.

I have known Mr. Gates for almost two decades and I can tell you whose guy Mr. Gates was originally. It must have been sometime in 1985 when my friend, Director of Central Intelligence Bill Casey, had me to lunch at his office and introduced me to someone he thought very highly of, a protege of his, Bob Gates. Bill always had proteges, but Mr. Gates was one of his favorites. Bill recognized that Mr. Gates was intelligent, principled, and understood the Soviet Union. In fact, Mr. Gates had done graduate work in the same department as I had, Indiana University’s Department of History, under a distinguished Soviet specialist who became a mentor to me and to the American Spectator’s Editorial Director Wladyslaw Pleszczynski.

From that point on, I watched Mr. Gates with especial interest and dined with him from time to time. Anyone who thinks Mr. Gates lacks grit or an independent mind is mistaken. He was clear-headed on the Soviets and will be clear-headed on the Islamofascists.

I well remember when he was drafting a speech in late 1989 or 1990 in which he presciently expressed doubt as to the effectiveness of General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev’s reforms. Though the content of the speech was suppressed it got into the public prints. And do you know who suppressed it? James Baker.

Mr. Gates, the first career CIA officer to become director of central intelligence, is a dedicated public servant. In his last months at CIA, he used to speak of his relish for a quiet retirement outside Washington during which he might read and reflect on the world. He also gave me and Wlady the best explanation of why in Operation Desert Storm our forces did not roll into Baghdad. We underestimated Saddam’s control of the country. We thought the regime would fall of its own weight. That estimate was wrong. If I recall the term Mr. Gates used. He said it turned out the Saddam regime was a “mom and pop” regime tightly controlled by the tyrant’s family. Obviously, Mr. Gates was right. Perhaps this explains why George Bush II did not wait a second time for the defeated regime to fall.

Now Mr. Gates is back to serve the country, and everyone should wish him well.

R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. is founder and editor in chief of the American Spectator, a contributing editor to the New York Sun, and an adjunct fellow at the Hudson Institute. His most recent book is “Madame Hillary: The Dark Road to the White House.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide